Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6084 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2021
T.C.A.No.80 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 08.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
T.C.A.No.80 of 2014
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle, Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
S.Duraipandi & S.Thalavaipandian
C/o CNGSN & Associates,
No.22, Vijayaraghava Road,
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
"A" Bench, dated 20.03.2013 in I.TA.No.2228/Mds/2012 Assessment
Year 2007-08.
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar,
Senior Standing Counsel
assisted by Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.C.A.No.80 of 2014
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2.The Revenue preferred this appeal challenging the order passed
by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.2228/Mds/2012 dated
20.03.2013.
3.The appeal was admitted on 22.07.2014 on the following
substantial question of law:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in directing the Assessing Officer to treat the cash seized to be first given credit as advance tax payment and then re-compute the interest u/s 234-A, 234-B and 234-C for all the assessment years 2002-
2003 to 2008-09?”
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.80 of 2014
4.It may not be necessary for us to answer the above substantial
question of law, as the monetary limit in this appeal is lesser than the
amount fixed by the Circular instructions issued by the Central Board of
Direct Taxes in Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. The said circular
covers the issue regarding chargeability of interest also. In paragraph – 4
of the said Circular it has been stated that in case the chargeability of
interest is the issue under dispute, the amount interested shall be the tax
effect. Since the quantum of interest charged under Section 234-D of the
Income Tax Act in the present case is lesser than Rs.50,00,000/- as stated
in the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, the Tax Case Appeal is
liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed.
The substantial question of law is left open for consideration in an
appropriate case. No costs.
Index : Yes/No [M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Internet : Yes 08.03.2021
va (6/7)
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "A" Bench
Page 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.80 of 2014
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
va
T.C.A.No.80 of 2014 (6/7)
08.03.2021
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!