Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramakrishna vs State Rep.By
2021 Latest Caselaw 12565 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12565 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021

Madras High Court
Ramakrishna vs State Rep.By on 28 June, 2021
                                                                                        Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                           DATED : 28.06.2021

                                                                CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                                     Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018
                                                 and Crl.M.P.No.2506 & 2507/2018

                     1.Ramakrishna
                     2.B.RAjesh                                                        ... Petitioners

                                                                  Vs.

                     State rep.by
                     Inspector of Police,
                     GRP Podhanur Police Station,
                     Podhanur.
                     Cr.No.185/2016                                                   ... Respondent

                     Prayer:
                                   Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and
                     quash the final report in C.C.NO.26/2017 on the file of the Judicial
                     Magistrate No.IV, Coimbatore.

                                         For Petitioners       : Mr.A.Thirumaran

                                         For Respondent        : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate
                                                                (Crl.Side)




                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                    Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018


                                                         ORDER

The petitioners have filed this petition seeking to call for the records

and to quash the final report in C.C.NO.26/2017, on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate No.IV, Coimbatore.

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the driver of the tipper

lorry, after unloading blue metals for on-going railway project, reversing the

lorry from the east side to the west side in a careless manner, it ran over on

the defacto complainant's child. The child had died. Hence, the defacto

complainant had lodged a police complaint. An FIR was registered and a

Charge Sheet was also filed in C.C.NO.26/2017, on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate No.IV, Coimbatore.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that they

were the railway contractors and they were no way connected with the

alleged offence and prays for quashment of C.C.NO.26/2017, on the file of

the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Coimbatore.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018

this issue involves adjudication on disputed question of facts and therefore,

if some outer time limit is given, the Criminal Case may be given disposal

as early as possible.

5. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all

factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court

cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of

Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioners to raise all the

grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own

merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere

with the proceedings pending before the Court below.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court to

dispense with the presence of the petitioners. Taking into consideration, the

facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioners is

dispensed with and they shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross

examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in Chief. The

petitioners shall be present before the Court below at the time of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018

questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the final

judgement.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a

direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in

C.C.NO.26/2017, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Coimbatore,

as expeditiously as possible. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day

basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court

reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC].

If the petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to

insist upon the presence of the petitioners and remand him to custody

as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR

PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191).

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28.06.2021 sk Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No

To

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018

1.Inspector of Police, GRP Podhanur Police Station, Podhanur.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

sk

Crl.O.P.No.5021 of 2018

28.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter