Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary To Government vs P.Chidambaram
2021 Latest Caselaw 12561 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12561 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021

Madras High Court
The Secretary To Government vs P.Chidambaram on 28 June, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.119 of 2021 and
                                                                          C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 28.06.2021

                                                      CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                              W.A. No.119 of 2021 and
                                               C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

                   1.The Secretary to Government
                     Agricultural Production and Commissioner
                     Agricultural Department
                     Fort St. George, Chennai - 9

                   2.The Director of Agriculture
                     Chepauk, Chennai - 5

                   3.The Joint Director of Agriculture
                     Sivagangai                                            ... Appellants


                                                         vs


                   1.P.Chidambaram
                     Deputy Agricultural Officer (Rtd)
                     Door No.54, V.O.C. Street
                     Sivagangai - 630 561
                     Sivagangai District

                   2.The Accountant General Officer (A&E)
                     Teynampet, Chennai.                                   ... Respondents



                                                       ****



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                           W.A. No.119 of 2021 and
                                                                             C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent

                   against the order dated 13.03.2019 made in W.P. No.3170 of 2014.

                                                           ****

                                    For Petitioner           :    Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                                  Govt. Advocate
                                    For R1                   :    M/s.G.Sridevi Chandran

                                    For R2                   :    No Appearance



                                                     JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

dated 13.03.2019 made in W.P. No.3170 of 2014.

2. At the time of disposal of the writ petition, the learned single

Judge had directed the first respondent therein/first appellant herein

to settle the DCRG benefits along with 9% interest from the date of

superannuation till the date of payment, within a period of four

months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. As the same

was not complied with, a contempt petition in Cont. Petn.

No.1782/2019 was filed. After initiation of the contempt proceedings,

the order of the learned single Judge was complied with in

Government Letter No.25811/AA4(2)/2019-22 Agriculture Department

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.119 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

dated 13.11.2019, the order to pay the DCRG was passed.

3. It is further stated that out of 9% interest payable, only 8%

interest was paid on 18.11.2019 and the balance 1% interest was also

paid on 09.04.2021, based on which the contempt petition was closed.

4. In view of the above compliance of the order of the learned

single Judge, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ appeal.

Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      28.06.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.119 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.119 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.694 of 2021

28.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter