Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.O.K.Films vs M/S.Aditya Cable Views
2021 Latest Caselaw 12504 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12504 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.O.K.Films vs M/S.Aditya Cable Views on 28 June, 2021
                                                                    C.S.No.54 of 2006

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 28.06.2021

                                                     CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                                C.S.No.54 of 2006



                     M/s.O.K.Films
                     Represented by its Proprietor
                     Mr.Mani
                     Airlines Buildings,
                     829, Anna Salai,
                     Chennai – 600 002.                               ...Plaintiff

                                                      .Vs.


                     1.M/s.Aditya Cable Views
                       Represented by its Proprietor
                       Mr.P.T.Jayaraman
                       213, Tower View Lodging Complex
                       Tower Junction
                       Nagercoil.

                     2.M/s.Motherland Enterprises
                       Rep. by Proprietor
                       Mr.Ali
                       Hotel Thanamani Lodge
                       Near Kudal Alankar Perumal Temple
                       Madurai – 1


                     Page No.1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 C.S.No.54 of 2006

                     3.M/s.Run Enterprises
                       Rep. by Partner
                       Mr.Moorthy
                       S/11, II Floor,
                       New Bus Stand
                       Salem 9

                     4.Solar Entertainments
                       Rep.
                       5/12 B, D 2nd Anna Street
                       Angammal Colony
                       Salem 9

                     5.M/s.Win Mediyas
                       Rep. by its Managing Partner
                       R.Balu
                       7-B, Angammal Colony, T V S Busstop
                       Salem 9

                     6.M/s.City Television Network
                       Rep. by its
                       No.230-231 PTR Complex
                       Opp. Municipal Office, Mount Road
                       Coonoor 643 162.

                     7.M/s.Madura Cable Net
                       Perumal Koil Street
                       Thiruvatchur & Post
                       Perambalur District                                        ... Defendants



                               Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read
                     with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Sections 55
                     and 62 of the Copy Rights Act, 1957 praying for a decree and judgment :

                     Page No.2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                     C.S.No.54 of 2006



                               a) for a declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the sole copyright
                     holder including the transport buses rights and cable TV rights for the
                     area of entire Tamil Nadu State in respect of the 276 films more fully
                     described in the schedule to the plaint. Consequently declare that the
                     Letter of arrangement dated 25.02.2005 is null and void.


                               b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men,
                     agent, servant etc., in any manner infringing the copy right of the
                     plaintiff by telecasting in respect of the 276 films in transport buses, or
                     through cable TV for the entire area of Tamil Nadu.


                               c) to direct the defendants to pay jointly and severally to the
                     plaintiff the sum of Rs.10,01,000/- towards compensation for
                     infringement of the copy right own by the plaintiff in respect of the said
                     276 films more fully described in the schedule to the plaint and


                               d) for costs of the suit.

                                      For Plaintiff        : Mr.Thiageswaran
                                                             for M/s.Waraon & Sairams

                                      For Defendants       : D1, D2 to D5 – unserved
                                                             D6 and D7 – No appearance

                                                           ********



                     Page No.3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                     C.S.No.54 of 2006


                                                      JUDGMENT

The suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking

a) for a declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the sole copyright

holder including the transport buses rights and cable TV rights for the

area of entire Tamil Nadu State in respect of the 276 films more fully

described in the schedule to the plaint. Consequently declare that the

Letter of arrangement dated 25.02.2005 is null and void.

b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men,

agent, servant etc., in any manner infringing the copy right of the

plaintiff by telecasting in respect of the 276 films in transport buses, or

through cable TV for the entire area of Tamil Nadu.

c) to direct the defendants to pay jointly and severally to the

plaintiff the sum of Rs.10,01,000/- towards compensation for

infringement of the copy right own by the plaintiff in respect of the said

276 films more fully described in the schedule to the plaint and

d) for costs of the suit.

Page No.4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.54 of 2006

2. Mr.Thiageswaran, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff

would submit that the Proprietor of the plaintiff is no more and nothing

survives in the suit.

3. Hence, the suit is dismissed as abated. No costs.



                                                                                          28.06.2021

                     dsa
                     Index      : No
                     Internet   : Yes
                     Non-speaking order



List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil

28.06.2021 dsa

Page No.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.54 of 2006

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.54 of 2006

28.06.2021

Page No.6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter