Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12476 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2021
T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 25.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
v.
G. Gita ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
"C" Bench, dated 31.07.2014 in ITA.No.1142/Mds/2014 for the
Assessment Year 2009-10.
For Appellant : Mr. Karthik Ranganathan,
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr. Ashokapathy
for M/s.Pass Associates
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
We have heard Mr. Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.Ashokapathy, learned counsel
for the respondent.
2. The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 31.07.2014 made in ITA.No.1142/Mds/2014 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "C" Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2009-2010.
3. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question
of law:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in ignoring the revised return filed by the assessee in terms of Section 139(5) of the Income Tax Act?”
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the
appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on
account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated
08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said
Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the
High Court has been increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that
the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.
5. In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect
in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty
is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the
appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [R.H., J.]
Index : Yes/No 25.06.2021
Internet : Yes
gv
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and R.HEMALATHA,J
gv
To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai,"C" Bench
T.C.A.No.182 of 2015
25.06.2021
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!