Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Radhika
2021 Latest Caselaw 12445 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12445 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Radhika on 25 June, 2021
                                                                                CMA No.161 of 2016

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 25.06.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                 CMA No.161 of 2016
                                                        and
                                                 CMP No.1356 of 2016


                     The Managing Director,
                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
                     3/127, Sala Medu,
                     Vazhutha reddy,
                     Villupuram District.                               ...    Appellant
                                                  Versus

                     1. Radhika
                     2. Minor Santhosh
                     3. Sugari @ Suganthi
                     4. Saraswathi                                      ...    Respondents


                           Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act against the judgment and decree dated 03.09.2015 made in
                     M.C.O.P. No.867 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
                     (Special District Judge) at Salem.


                               For Appellant          : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar
                               For Respondents        : Not ready in notice reg. R1 to R4




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/6
                                                                                      CMA No.161 of 2016

                                                            JUDGMENT

(Heard Video Conference)

This appeal has been filed by the Transport Corporation

challenging the impugned award dated 03.09.2015 passed by the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special District Judge), Salem in MCOP

No.867 of 2011.

2. The appellant in this appeal has challenged only the quantum of

compensation fixed by the Tribunal as according to them it is excessive.

3. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under

the impugned award are as follows :

                                              Heads                Amount awarded
                                                                    by the Tribunal
                                                                         (Rs.)
                                   Loss of future income of the           7,34,400/-
                                   deceased
                                   Loss of love and affection to            20,000/-
                                   the 3rd and 4th petitioners
                                   (parents of the deceased)
                                   Rs.10,000/- each
                                   Funeral expenses                         25,000/-
                                   Loss of consortium to 1st                25,000/-
                                   petitioner
                                   Loss of love and affection to            40,000/-
                                   2nd petitioner (son of the
                                   deceased)
                                   Total                                  8,44,400/-


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA No.161 of 2016

4. Aggrieved by the award dated 03.09.2015 passed by the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special District Judge), Salem in MCOP

No.867 of 2011, this appeal has been filed by the Appellant / Transport

Corporation.

5. Heard Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the appellant.

Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the respondents,

notice to the respondents is dispensed with.

6. This Court has perused the materials and evidence available on

record before the Tribunal.

7. The deceased was aged 27 years and was self employed when

the accident happened on 24.01.2011. The cause and date of the

accident as well as the avocation and age of the deceased have not been

disputed by the appellant / Transport Corporation before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal has fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased at

Rs.6,000/- and has deducted 1/3rd towards his personal expenses in view

of the fact that the claimants are his wife, his minor son and his parents.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA No.161 of 2016

The Tribunal has also adopted the correct multiplier of 17, since the

deceased was aged 27 years at the time of the accident.

8. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- each to the parents of the

deceased, totally amounting Rs.20,000/- towards loss of love and

affection of the deceased. The Tribunal has also awarded Rs.25,000/-

towards funeral expenses and Rs.25,000/- towards loss of consortium to

the first respondent / first claimant who is his wife. The Tribunal has

also awarded a compensation of Rs.40,000/- to the minor child of the

deceased. Thus, the total compensation awarded by the Tribunal at

Rs.8,44,400/- to the respondents / claimants cannot be considered to be

excessive, as alleged by the appellant/ Transport Corporation.

9. For the foregoing reasons, this Court does not find any merit in

this appeal and accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall stand

dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.

10. The Appellant / Transport Corporation is directed to deposit

the entire award amount awarded by the Tribunal together with interest at https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA No.161 of 2016

7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of realization, less

the amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.867 of

2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special District

Judge) at Salem, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of

a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is

directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank account of the

respondents 1st, 3rd and 4th / major claimants, as per the same ratio of

apportionment made by the Tribunal, through RTGS, within a period of

two weeks thereafter. Insofar as the share of the 2nd respondent / minor

claimant is concerned, the same shall be deposited in Fixed deposit in

any one of the Nationalised Banks, till he attains the age of majority and

the interest accrued thereon shall be withdrawn by the guardian of the

minor claimant once in three months, directly from the Bank.

25.06.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA No.161 of 2016

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

To

1.The Special District Judge at Salem.

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section High Court of Madras, Chennai - 104.

CMA No.161 of 2016

25.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter