Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Selvamani vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 12225 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12225 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021

Madras High Court
Selvamani vs The District Collector on 23 June, 2021
                                                                            W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED : 23.06.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                             W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019
                                          and W.M.P.(MD).No.14378 of 2019


                     Selvamani                                                     ...Petitioner
                                                          Vs.


                     1.The District Collector,
                       Trichy District,
                       Trichy.

                     2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                       Musiri Taluk,
                       Trichy District.

                     3.The Tahsildar,
                       Thuraiyur Taluk,
                       Trichy District.

                     4.The Inspector of Police,
                       Thuraiyur Police Station,
                       Trichy.

                     5.Rengaraj
                     6.Durai Pandiyan
                     7.Kaliyaperumal
                     8.Raji
                     9.Periyannah
                     10.Selvakumar
                     11.Chinnasamy                                          ... Respondents


                    1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019


                     Prayer: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to

                     issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd

                     respondent's impugned order in Na.Ka.M(1)-100-2018, dated 26.07.2019 and

                     quash the same as it violates the right of worship of the village people and

                     permit them to perform their poojas and other rituals at Arulmigu Selva Maha

                     Mariyamman Kovil and Selva Vinayagar Kovil at Ammapatti Village,

                     Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District, by considering the petitioner representation,

                     dated 22.07.2019, within the period as stipulated by this Court.

                                    For Petitioner                 : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen

                                    For Respondents                : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R1 to 4
                                                                     Government Advocate

                                                                    Mr.Mayilvahana Rajendran
                                                                        for R9 to R11

                                                        ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned

order passed by the third respondent, dated 26.07.2019, wherein, the third

respondent has directed the parties not to conduct any pooja or festival till the

completion of the civil proceedings between the parties.

2.Heard Mr.A.Haja Mohideen, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Government Advocate appearing for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019

the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.Mayilvahana Rajendran, learned counsel

appearing for the respondents 9 to 11.

3.It is seen from records that there is a long standing dispute between

the petitioner and private respondents and there is also a suit pending in

O.S.No.172 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur.

Various attempts were made to some how pacify both the parties and conduct

the festival in a peaceful manner. It is clear from the impugned order passed

by the third respondent that the parties are not in a mood to compromise and

the dispute continues. Therefore, fearing law and order problem the third

respondent has passed the order directing both the parties not to conduct any

pooja or festival till the completion of the civil proceedings.

4.In the considered view of this Court, the third respondent has taken

into consideration the prevailing situation and has come to the conclusion and

this Court does not find any illegality or infirmity in the decision taken by the

third respondent.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this order was

passed two years back and atleast now the third respondent can be directed to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019

reconsider the decision after taking note of the prevailing situation.

6.There are only two options that are left to the parties. Either the

parties will have to await the final judgment and decree in the pending suit or

the parties must come to some agreement to conduct the festival in a smooth

manner and the same can even be placed before the concerned Court, where

the suit is pending and decree can be passed in terms of the understanding

between the parties. It will also be left open to make a representation to the

third respondent who can call the parties for enquiry and if the parties agree

to carry on with the poojas and festival in a peaceful manner, an attempt can

be made to permit them to celebrate the same. If there is no agreement

between the parties, the third respondent has to stick on to the impugned

order passed, on 26.07.2019. Except giving this clarity no further orders can

be passed in this writ petition.

7.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.06.2021

Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No TM

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019

NOTE:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

TM

Order made in

W.P.(MD).No.17927 of 2019

23.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter