Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12078 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2021
W.A.No.26 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.06.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.A.No.26 of 2020
1.Kothanda Naidu
2.Venkatesa Naidu
3.Sudhakar .. Appellants
Vs
1.R.Padamchand Jain
2.The District Registrar Chennai North
No.1, Moorthikal Lane, 1st Lane Beach,
Chennai - 600 001.
3.The Sub Registrar
Arani Sub-Registration Office,
No.3,S.P.Koil Street,
Arani, Ponneri Taluk,
Tiruvallur District. .. Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
dated 26.07.2019 made in W.P.No.10039 of 2019.
For Appellants : Mr.N.Manoharan
for Mr.P.Krishnan
For Respondents : Mr.R.Munusamy for R1
Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh
Government Counsel
for R2 and R3
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.26 of 2020
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant being the first
respondent in the writ petition, aggrieved by the observation made by
the learned Single Judge, while dismissing the writ petition qua the
prayer sought for, inter alia, holding that in view of the rigour of
Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, duty is enjoined upon the
parties to obtain prior permission for transferring or otherwise dealing
with the property in question.
2. The aforesaid observation, apart from being not germane to
the relief sought for in the writ petition, is also contrary to law. Section
52 of the Transfer of Property Act speaks of the effect of alienation
meaning thereby there is no prior permission for alienation. In any
case, two suits have been filed by the first respondent being the writ
petitioner stated to be pending in O.S.Nos.44 of 2018 and 55 of 2019
on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukottai
and Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur. The earlier suit in
O.S.No.44 of 2018 has been transferred to the District Court, Tiruvallur
and re-numbered.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.26 of 2020
3. In such view of the matter, the observation made by the
learned Single Judge on the scope and applicability of Section 52 of the
Transfer of Property Act stands eschewed and to that extent, the writ
appeal is allowed. However, we make it clear that our order will not
stand in the way of the parties seeking appropriate orders in the
pending suits.
4. The writ appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated above.
No costs.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.)
21.06.2021
Index:Yes/No
mmi/ssm
To
1.The District Registrar Chennai North No.1, Moorthikal Lane, 1st Lane Beach, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The Sub Registrar Arani Sub-Registration Office, No.3,S.P.Koil Street, Arani, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.26 of 2020
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
and R.N.MANJULA,J.
mmi
W.A.No.26 of 2020
21.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!