Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12065 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2021
Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
and Crl.M.P.Nos.5802, 770, 769, 5795, 1085 & 1086 of 2018
Mala Agarwal ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2043 of 2018
Suraj Rai ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2624 of 2018
Vs.
Rajiv Agarwal
S/o.Late R.G.Agarwal ...Respondent in both Crl.O.P.Nos.
Prayer: These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
seeking to call for records in C.C.No.588 of 2017, pending on the file of the
learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, and quash the same.
For both Crl.O.P.Nos
For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam
For Respondent : M/s.R.Amizhthu
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
ORDER
(The Case has been heard through Video Conference)
These petitions have been filed challenging the proceedings initiated
by the respondent against the petitioners under Sections 494 and 495 r/w
Section 109 of IPC.
2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioners are all factual
in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot
decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal
Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioners to raise all the grounds
before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits
and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the
proceedings pending before the Court below.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court to
dispense with the presence of the petitioners. Taking into consideration, the
facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioners is
dispensed with and they shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross
examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in Chief. The
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
petitioners shall be present before the Court below at the time of
questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the final
judgement.
4. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are disposed of
with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC
No.588 of 2017 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day basis in
accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in
Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the
petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist
upon the presence of the petitioners and remand him to custody as per
the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR
PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191).
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
gbi 21.06.2021
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/ No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
gbi
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate,
Alandur.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai 600 104.
Crl.O.P.Nos.2043 and 2624 of 2018
21.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!