Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15273 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2021
1 Crl.O.P.No.13015 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Crl.O.P.No. 13015 of 2017
and Crl.M.P.Nos. 8649 and 8493 of 2017
R.K. Renuka ...Petitioner
-Vs-
Kodiswaran ...Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 of CrPC., to
withdraw and transfer the C.A.No. 130 of 2017 from the file of the
Additional Sessions Judge, Erode to the Additional Sessions Judge,
Gobichettipalayam.
[Amended as per order dated 11.07.2017 made
in Crl.M.P.No.8650/2017 in Crl.O.P.No.13015/2017].
For Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Muruganraja
For Respondent : Mr. S. Parthasarathy
----
ORDER
This petition has been filed to withdraw and transfer the C.A.No.
130 of 2017 from the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Erode to
the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam.
http://www.judis.nic.in
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner/appellant has preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.130 of 2017,
pending on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Erode, against
the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam in
S.T.C.No.5312 of 2014, dated 29.04.2014, the petitioner was convicted to
undergo simple imprisonment for 10 months and awarded compensation a
sum of Rs.20,00,000/- for cheque amount U/s.357(3) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure. However, the petitioner had proved her case by
preponderance of probabilities and it is for the respondent/complainant to
rebut the case of the appellant and he has not rebutted the said presumption
under the Negotiable Instrumentes Act.
3. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
that as the petitioner is having 4 year old child and she is unable to travel
from her place of residence to the Addl. Sessions Court, Erode for every
hearing of the case. The petitioner and the respondent are residing in
Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode. Therefore, no prejudice would be caused to
the respondent if this petition is allowed. Hence, he seeks to transfer the
http://www.judis.nic.in
case as prayed for.
4. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that the appellant is having four
year old child and she is uanble to travel, attend the hearings frequently and
plead her defence. Hence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition to
transfer the case in C.A.No.130 of 2017 from the file of the learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Erode, to the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Gobichettipalayam. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous
Petitions are closed.
29.07.2021
Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order msm
To
1. The Additional Sessions Judge, Erode.
2. The Additional Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
http://www.judis.nic.in
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
msm
Crl.O.P.No. 13015 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 8649 and 8493 of 2017
29.07.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!