Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalaivanan vs M.Manoharan
2021 Latest Caselaw 15131 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15131 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Kalaivanan vs M.Manoharan on 28 July, 2021
                                                                               C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 28.07.2021

                                                      CORAM

                                     THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA


                                         C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1992 & 1993 of 2017
                                                         and
                                            CMP.Nos.9606 & 11370 of 2017

                 C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017

                 1.Kalaivanan

                 2.Devendaran

                 3.R.Palani                             ...         Petitioners/Defendants 3 to 5

                                                         Vs.

                 M.Manoharan                            ...                Respondent/Plaintiff

                 PRAYER : The Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil
                 Procedure Code, to set aside the order and decretal order dated 10.04.2017
                 passed in EA.No.234 of 2016 in EP.No.207 of 2008 in O.S.No.426 of 1999 on
                 the file of the Principal District Munsif, Chidambaram.


                 C.R.P.(NPD).No.1993 of 2017

                 R.Palani                               ...         Petitioner/Defendant-3

                                                         Vs.

                 M.Manoharan                                  ...   Respondent/Plaintiff


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                 1/6
                                                                                    C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017


                 PRAYER : The Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil
                 Procedure Code, to set aside the order and decretal order dated 10.04.2017
                 passed in EA.No.235 of 2016 in EP.No.207 of 2008 in O.S.No.426 of 1999 on
                 the file of the Principal District Munsif, Chidambaram.


                                        In Both CRPs.

                                        For Petitioners   : Mr.Thiruneelakandan
                                        For Respondent : No appearance

                                                      COMMON ORDER

                                              (Heard through video conferencing)

                                   These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioners to

                 challenge the orders of the Executing Court (Principle Munsif Court,

                 Chidambaram) dated 10.04.2017 passed in E.A.Nos.234 & 235 of 2016

                 respectively, in E.P.No.207/2008 in O.S.No.426/1999.




                 2.        These Civil Revision Petitioners are the defendants 3 to 5 in the suit. The

                 Execution Petition has been filed to execute the decree passed in the suit. These

                 petitioners remained absent in the Execution Proceedings and hence they were

                 set an exparte. Subsequent to that an order for arrest also passed against these

                 petitioners on 10.04.2017. Hence the petitioners have filed an application in

                 E.A.No.234/2016 to recall the arrest warrant and also to set aside the exparte

                 order.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                 2/6
                                                                                  C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017




                 3.          And the Revision Petitioner in C.R.P.1993/2017 is the 5th Judgment

                 Debtor/ 5th defendant. He has filed a petition before the Executing Court in

                 E.A.No. 235/2016 to set aside the exparte order passed in the Execution

                 Proceedings on 03.08.2016. The learned Executing judge heard both

                 E.A.No.234/2017 and 235/2017 together and dismissed the same. Aggrieved

                 over that the said orders of dismissal this Revision Petitioners have filed these

                 Revision Petitions.




                 4.        Now the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners

                 have absolutely no objection to execute the decree and they are ready to file an

                 affidavit to that effect before the Execution Court. If the petitioners are not

                 going to obstruct the Execution Proceedings and they are ready to abide by the

                 decree, there is no need to pass orders of arrest against them. Since the

                 petitioners are ready to obey the decree, they may not have any counter in the

                 Execution Proceedings.




                 5.          In view of the same, I prefer to set aside the order of arrest passed in

                 E.A.Nos.234/2016 and 235/2016 on the condition that the petitioners should

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                 3/6
                                                                                   C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017


                 execute an affidavit stating that they have no objection to execute the decree

                 and that they will not cause any obstructions during the process of execution.




                 6.           It is further submitted that the decree has been already executed with

                 regard        the   relief   of   the   mandatory   injunction   on   05.07.2010          in

                 E.A.No.172/2010. Since the decree is granted for permanent injunction also, it

                 is desirable that these petitioners file an affidavit as assured by them. With

                 these observations, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed off. No costs.

                 Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.




                                                                                             28.07.2021

                 Speaking
                 Index : Yes
                 Internet : Yes/No
                 Jrs




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                 4/6
                                                    C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017


                 To

                 1.The Principal District Munsif,
                   Chidambaram.

                 2.The Section Officer,
                   V.R.Section,
                   High Court, Madras.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                 5/6
                                                     C.R.P.(NPD).No.1992 of 2017


                                                    R.N.MANJULA,J.

jrs

C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1992 & 1993 of 2017 and CMPNos.9606 & 11370 of 2017

28.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter