Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14825 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI
Crl.R.C(MD)No.433 of 2021
and
Crl MP(MD)No.4522 of 2021
Suresh @ Thol Suresh : Revision Petitioner/
Petitioner
Vs.
State rep. by
The Sub Inspector of Police,
Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station,
Madurai District. : Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision has been filed under Section
397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order, dated
09.04.2021 passed in Crl.MP No.1752 of 2021 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu
for Mr.K.Jeyamohan
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy
Government Advocate (Crl. side)
JUDGMENT
This criminal revision is directed against the order, dated
09.04.2021 made in Crl.MP No.1752 of 2021 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2.It is seen from the records that a case in Crime No.2426
of 2020 was registered under sections 363 and 365 of IPC against
the petitioner and some others on the allegation that they
kidnapped the son of the de-facto complainant namely Kishore in
the Innova Car TN-09-AK-9355. The petitioner was arrested and
remanded to judicial custody, on 29.12.2020. The petitioner filed a
bail petition in Crl.MP No.422 of 2021 before the Judicial
Magistrate No.VI, Madurai. The learned Magistrate, by order, dated
25.01.2021 allowed the petitioner and released the petitioner on
bail with a condition to appear before the respondent police every
day at 10.00 am until further orders. On 23.02.2021, the said
condition was modified on the petition filed by the petitioner in
Crl.MP No.735 of 2021 and the petitioner was directed to appear
before the respondent police every Monday at 10.00 a.m until
further orders. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a petitioner in Crl.MP
No.1536 of 2011 seeking relaxation of the condition imposed on
him. The said petition was dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate
No.VI, Madurai, on 26.03.2021. The subsequent application filed by
the petitioner in Crl.MP No.1752 of 2021 was also came to be
dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, on
09.04.2021. Hence, the petitioner is before this court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
3.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and
perused the materials available on record.
4.It is the main contention of the petitioner that the
learned Magistrate without putting him on notice, has mechanically
cancelled the bail and the learned Magistrate has mechanically
passed the impugned order and prays that the impugned order
passed by the Magistrate is to be set aside.
5.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has
complied with the condition daily till 23.02.2021 and subsequently
the condition was modified and the petitioner was directed to
appear before the respondent police every Monday at 10.00 am
until further orders. Thereafter, petition has been filed by the
petitioner seeking further relaxation of the condition on medical
grounds. The petitioner has also produced the medical certificate
for his illness. However, without considering the medical records,
the learned Judicial Magistrate has mechanically cancelled the bail
granted to the petitioner. This court is of the considered view that
the impugned order passed by the Judicial Magistrate is not
correct.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
6.In view of that, this criminal revision is allowed. The
impugned order, dated 09.04.2021 passed in Crl.M.P No.1752 of
2021 by the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, is set aside. The
petitioner is directed to comply with the condition as imposed by
the learned Judicial Magistrate, dated 23.02.2021, in Crl.MP No.
735 of 2021 without any default in future. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
26.07.2021
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
er
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.KRISHNAVALLI,J
er
To,
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.
2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Judgment made in Crl.R.C(MD)No.433 of 2021
26.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!