Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14584 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2021
W.P.No.44446 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.44446 of 2006
The Management,
PSG Coimbatore Urban Leprosy Eradication Scheme,
(P.S.G. Cules), Project Office,
24 & 25, Rajalakshmi Colony,
T.V.S. Nagar, Thadagam Road,
Edaiyarpalayam Post,
Coimbatore – 641 025. ... Petitioner
vs.
1. The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Coimbatore.
2. K.Marimuthu
3. A.A.Suresh Kumar
4. K.Ajith Kumar
5. P.Bhaskaran ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st
Respondent/Labour Court, Coimbatore made in its common interim order in
I.D.Nos.241/2000, 242/2000, 243/2000 and 245/2000, dated 13.07.2006, and
quash the same.
Page No.1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.P.No.44446 of 2006
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Silambanan, Senior Counsel
for M/s.Silambanan Associates
For Respondents 2, 3 & 5 : Mr.M.Christopher
For 4th Respondent : Dismissed vide order dated 30.09.2011
ORDER
Petitioner/Management has come up with this Writ Petition
challenging the preliminary order dated 13.07.2006 passed by the 1st
Respondent/Labour Court in I.D.Nos.241/2000, 242/2000, 243/2000 and
245/2000.
2. In the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of
Cooper Engineering Ltd. Vs. P.P.Mundhe reported in 1975 (2) SCC 661,
the employer can question the preliminary Award along with the final Award
and that, the proceedings cannot be stalled.
3. In the case of Shankar Chakravarti vs. Britannia Biscuit Co.
Ltd. reported in 1979 SCC (3) 371, the Apex Court has held that, there is no
need to remind an employer to let in evidence. That is, in the absence of plea
that, in case, the domestic enquiry is not fair and proper, the employer must
be permitted to lead evidence to establish the charges and there is no need to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.44446 of 2006
permit the employer to lead fresh evidence.
4. As there is no interim order in the case on hand and as the
Industrial Dispute is of the year 2000, the Labour Court would have decided
the matter by this time.
5. In view of the above, no further order is required in this matter.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
20.07.2021
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order : Yes/No
(aeb)
To:
The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Coimbatore.
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.44446 of 2006
(aeb)
W.P.No.44446 of 2006
20.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!