Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishnamoorthi vs State Rep. By The
2021 Latest Caselaw 14381 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14381 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Krishnamoorthi vs State Rep. By The on 19 July, 2021
                                                                                 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021



                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 19.07.2021

                                                          CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

                                             Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021
                                           and Crl.M.P(MD)No.4912 of 2021
                     1.Krishnamoorthi
                     2.Dinesh
                     3.Sankar
                     4.Ganesmoorthi
                     5.Packiyaraj                      ... Petitioners/Petitioners/A2 to A6
                                                            Vs.
                     State rep. by the
                     Sub Inspector of Police,
                     Nadukaveri Police Station,
                     Thanjavur District.
                     (In Crime No.153 of 2013) ... Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
                     PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
                     Cr.P.C, to set aside the dismissal order passed in C.M.P.No.1901 of 2020
                     in C.C.No.128 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate,
                     Thiruvaiyaru dated 29.04.2021.
                                     For Petitioners        : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan
                                     For R1 and R2         : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                          ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the dismissal order

passed in C.M.P.No.1901 of 2020 in C.C.No.128 of 2015 on the file of

the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru dated 29.04.2021. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021

2. The petitioners are facing charges for the offences under

Sections 147, 294(b), 352, 354, 506(ii) IPC before the trial court.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that P.W.3 and

P.W.5 were examined in chief on 19.07.2017 but on that day, there was

no cross-examination on the part of the petitioner and it was closed. He

would further submit that the case was posted on 24.07.2021 for the

purpose of further examination of the witnesses.

4. On a perusal of records, it is seen that after lapse of 3 years, a

petition has been filed seeking permission to cross-examine P.W.3 and

P.W.5. It is mentioned in the order that the judgment reported in

2015(3)SCC 220 in Vinod Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab is relied on

by the State. It is also stated in the order that no such reasons were given

by the petitioner to cross-examine P.W.3 and P.W.5 and on that finding,

the petition came to be dismissed. Challenging the said order, the present

petition has been filed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the date

of chief examination, the senior counsel could not appear before the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021

court and since the junior counsel has appeared, it was recorded that

there was no cross-examination.

6. This Court heard the submissions made on either side and

perused the entire records carefully.

7. Considering the nature of the offences that are alleged against

the petitioners, final opportunity can be given to the petitioners to cross-

examine P.W.3 and P.W.5 on the following conditions:

The petitioners shall deposit Rs.1500/-(Rupees one thousand and five hundred only) as cost before the concerned court. On such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru shall fix a specific date for cross-examination and send summons to P.W.3 and P.W.5 to appear on that day. The petitioners shall cross- examine them on the same day without further adjournment. If any violation noticed, their right to cross- examine P.W.3 and P.W.5 will be forfeited.

8. With the above direction, the order passed C.M.PNo.1901 of

2020 in C.C.No.128 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate,

Thiruvaiyaru dated 29.04.2021 is set aside.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021

9. In the result, this petition is allowed to the extent indicated

above. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

19.07.2021

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No CM

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To,

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Nadukaveri Police Station, Thanjavur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

CM

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9622 of 2021 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.4912 of 2021

19.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter