Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Res Q Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs Rajdeep Energies Pvt. Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 14078 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14078 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Res Q Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs Rajdeep Energies Pvt. Ltd on 14 July, 2021
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     Dated : 14.07.2021

                                                          CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

                                               C.S.(Com.Div.) No.180 of 2019
                                                  and O.A.No.227 of 2019

                     Res Q Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,
                     #48, Vijaya Nagar, II Street, Sri Devi Garden,
                     Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 087,
                     Rep. by its Director Mr.Magesh.
                                                                                           ...Plaintiff

                                                           /versus/

                     Rajdeep Energies Pvt. Ltd.,
                     5/315, Ground Floor, St. Marys Street,
                     Santhosh Nagar, Palavakkam,
                     Chennai 600 041,
                     Rep. by its Director.
                                                                                         ...Defendant

                                    This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 Original Side
                     Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC and under Sections 27, 29, 134
                     and 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying for the following:
                                    a) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by itself, its
                     partners, men, servants, agents, representatives, stockists or anyone
                     claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the
                     plaintiff's registered trademark RESQ by using an identical mark RESQ
                     or any other trademark deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/4
                     registered trademark or in any manner whatsoever;
                                   b) a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by itself, its
                     partners, men,        servants, agents, representatives, stockists or anyone
                     claiming through or under them from in any manner passing off or
                     enabling other to pass off the defendant's products as that of plaintiff's
                     products by manufacturing, selling, offering to sell, distributing,
                     stocking, displaying, printing, advertising using the trademark RESQ that
                     is identical to plaintiff's trademark RESQ or in any manner whatsoever;
                                   c) the defendant be ordered to surrender to plaintiff for
                     destruction of all products, labels, cartons, business cards, leaflets,
                     promotional materials, broachers, dyes, blocks, moulds, screen prints,
                     packing materials and other materials using the infringing trademark
                     RESQ or any other trademark deceptively similar to that of plaintiff's
                     registered trademark RESQ;
                                   d) to grant damages for a sum of Rs.10,000/- in favour of the
                     plaintiff and against defendant;
                                   e) a preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff
                     directing the defendants to render accounts and profits made using the
                     trademark RESQ and a final decree be passed in favour of plaintiff for
                     the amount of profits thus found to have been made by the defendant
                     after verifying the accounts;
                                   f) for costs of the suit.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     2/4
                                            For plaintiff      : M/s.Suba Shiny

                                            For Defendant      : M/s.Thenkodi Annam Nelson



                                                      JUDGMENT

Pending suit, the parties have entered into compromise and have filed a memorandum of compromise dated 28.03.2021.

2.In view of the terms entered into between the plaintiff and

the defendant as found in paragraph 4 of the memorandum of

compromise, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. Paragraph 4

of the memorandum of compromise shall form part of the decree. No

order as to costs. The connected application is closed.

14.07.2021

vri

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

Vri

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.180 of 2019 and O.A.No.227 of 2019

14.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter