Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13754 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2021
REV.APLC.(MD).No.263 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.07.2021
CORAM:
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
AND
The Hon'ble Mrs.JUSTICE R. THARANI
REV.APLC(MD).No.263 of 2019
and C.M.P.(MD)No.12406 of 2019
Arulmigu Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple,
Rep.by its Executive Officer,
Srirangam, Trichy. ...petitioner
Vs.
1.The Sub-Registrar,
Illuppur, Illuppur Taluk,
Pudukottai District.
2.The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious Charitable
Endowment Department,
Near Old Municipality Office,
Pudukottai.
3.Chelladurai.
4.Sri Ramanuja Koodam,
Rep.by its Trustee viz.
G.Krishnamoorthy ... Respondents
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
REV.APLC.(MD).No.263 of 2019
PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section
114 of C.P.C., to review the order passed by this Court in W.A.(MD).No.
372 of 2017 dated 27.04.2017 and allow the present Review Application.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Baskaran,
Standing Counsel for Government
for RR1 & 2
Mr.C.Venkateshkumar for R3
Mr.G.Prabhu Rajendran for R4
ORDER
[Order of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.]
This Review application has been filed by the third party viz.,
Arulmigu Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangam, Trichy, to review
the judgment dated 27.04.2017, passed in W.A.(MD)No.372 of 2017.
2. The said W.A.(MD)No.372 of 2017 was filed challenging an
order in W.P.No.(MD)No.6355 of 2014, dated 06.02.2017. The review is
primarily filed on the ground that though the applicant temple was a
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ REV.APLC.(MD).No.263 of 2019
proper necessary party to the Writ Petition, they were not impleaded,
though they were impleaded in an earlier Writ Petition, which was
withdrawn and in the Second Writ Petition, viz., W.P.(MD)No.6355 of
2014, they were not impleaded and an order has been passed upon
incorrect facts. The review petitioner temple has also filed W.A.No.549
of 2017, questioning the correctness of the order in W.P.(MD)No.6355 of
2014, dated 06.02.2017. Therefore, we are of the view that the Review
application can be closed preserving all the grounds raised by the review
applicant to be canvassed in W.A.(MD)No.549 of 2017.
3. With the above observation, this Review Application is closed.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(T.S.S.,J.) (R.T.,J.)
09.07.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
vsm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ REV.APLC.(MD).No.263 of 2019
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.
and R. THARANI, J.
vsm
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Sub-Registrar, Illuppur, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukottai District.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Near Old Municipality Office, Pudukottai. Order made in REV.APLC(MD).No.263 of 2019
Dated:
09.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!