Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs P. Periyasamy
2021 Latest Caselaw 13602 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13602 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs P. Periyasamy on 8 July, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.1791 of 2017 and
                                                                         C.M.P. No.22591 of 2017

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 08.07.2021

                                                     CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                              W.A. No.1791 of 2017
                                                        and
                                             C.M.P. No. 22591 of 2017

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                     Represented by its Secretary,
                     Environment and Forest Department,
                     Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
                     Having Office at Panagal Maaligai,
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

                   3.The Conservator of Forest,
                     Forest Marabiyal Division,
                     Coimbatore – 641 043.

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
                     Office at DMS Compound,
                     Teynampet,
                     Chennai – 600 018.

                   5.Government of Tamil Nadu,
                     Rep. by it Secretary,
                     Finance Department,
                     Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.                         ... Appellants

                                                       vs

                   P. Periyasamy                                             ... Respondent



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                      W.A. No.1791 of 2017 and
                                                                       C.M.P. No.22591 of 2017

                                                         ****
                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   praying to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.11991 of 2015 dated
                   24.04.2015.
                                                         ****


                                    For Appellants   :   Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                         Government Counsel


                                                     JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the Writ Court

dated 24.04.2015 made in W.P.No.11991 of 2015. The appellants

herein are the respondents before the writ court and the respondent

herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent, who is the writ petitioner, was appointed as

a temporary Plot Watcher in the appellant/Forest department on

04.11.1978 and his services were regularised on 28.05.2003 and he

retired on 31.03.2014. As his services were regularised after 24 years,

he prayed for counting of 50% of the temporary services rendered by

him along with his remaining service for the purpose of calculating the

pension and retiral benefits by filing a writ of mandamus in

W.P.No.11991 of 2015. The said writ petition was disposed of, based

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1791 of 2017 and C.M.P. No.22591 of 2017

on the judgment passed in W.A. Nos.27 and 28 of 2012 dated

13.02.2012. The appellants were directed to consider and dispose of

petitioner's representation based on the orders passed in the above

referred writ appeal in a time bound manner. It is also to be noted

that the said issue of counting 50% of the temporary services

rendered by a person for computing the pensionary benefits is no

longer res integra in view of the recent judgment of the Full Bench of

this court in the Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. vs. R.

Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC 705.

3. However the learned Government Counsel representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect vide G.O.(3D)No.22

Environment and Forests (FR-2) Department, dated 30.05.2016.

4. In view of the above, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                                                                           [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                                 08.07.2021
                   Index                 : Yes/No
                   Internet              : Yes/No
                   rsi

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1791 of 2017 and C.M.P. No.22591 of 2017

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

rsi

W.A. No.1791 of 2017 and C.M.P. No. 22591 of 2017

08.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter