Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13488 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016
& O.A.No.1138/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016(A)
and
O.A.No.1138 of 2016
M/s.Noves Communications Pvt. Ltd.,
Rep by its General Manager Operations,
Mr.N.Gopalakrishnan
B/301, Remi Biz Court, Plot No.9
Shah Industrial Estate,
Off Veeral Desai Road,
Andheri (West) Mumbai-400 058. .. Plaintiff
/versus/
Hotel Leela Palace Chennai,
Represented by its General Manager,
Adyar Sea face, M.R.C.Nagar,
Chennai-600 028. .. Defendant
This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 Original Side
Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC Read With Sections 51, 55, 62
of the Copyright Act, 1957, prayed for (a) For a permanent injunction
restraining the defendant, their men, partners, directors, employees,
agents, servants, assigns, heirs, successors, assignees, licensees,
representatives or any person claiming through them or acting on their
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016
& O.A.No.1138/2016
behalf or any other person claiming through/under them from in any
manner publicly performing or communicating the sound recordings
works of the plaintiff to the public or allowing their premises or any
premises under their control to be used for the said purpose without
license from the plaintiff or in otherwise infringing copyright in any
work assigned to the plaintiff;
(b) Costs of the suit.
For plaintiff : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam
For Defendant : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The suit is filed for the relief of permanent injunction
restraining the defendant, their men and agents from any manner publicly
performing or communicating the sound recording works of the plaintiff
to the public or allowing their premises for such communication.
2. At the time of admission, this Court, considering the prima
facie case made out by the plaintiff, granted interim order as prayed. The
suit summon was served on the defendant on 11.05.2017. However, there
is no appearance on behalf of the defendant.
3. Today, the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016 & O.A.No.1138/2016
defendant has entered into compromise and agreed to pay royalty to the
plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff is not pressing the suit.
4. Recording the same, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Consequently, connected application is also closed. No order as to costs.
07.07.2021
Index : yes/no
rpl
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
rpl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016 & O.A.No.1138/2016
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.962 of 2016 and O.A.No.1138 of 2016
07.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!