Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arulmigu Subramaniyasamy Kovil vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 13420 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13420 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Arulmigu Subramaniyasamy Kovil vs The District Collector on 7 July, 2021
                                                                   W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 07.07.2021

                                                    CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
                                               AND
                                THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                  W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013
                                                   and
                   M.P.(MD) Nos.2 of 2013 and 1 & 2 of 2014 in W.P.(MD) No.9779 of 2013

                W.P.(MD)No.9779 of 2013:

                Arulmigu Subramaniyasamy Kovil
                          Valagam Vijaparikal Sangam,
                Tiruchendoor – 628 215,
                Tuticorin District, Rep. by its Secretary
                S.Neelavannan                                              ... Petitioner
                                                            Vs.

                1.The District Collector,
                  Tuticorin District,
                  Tuticorin.
                2.The Executive Officer,
                  Special Grade Town Panchayat,
                  Tiruchendoor,
                  Tuticorin District.
                3.The Thasildar,
                  Tiruchendoor Taluk,
                  Tuticorin District.
                4.The Joint Commissioner and Executive Officer,
                  Arulmigu Subramaniyasamy Thirukovil,
                  Tiruchendoor, Tuticorin District.
                5.Manalmedu M.Suresh,
                  Ex. Municipal Councilor,
                  Tiruchendoor,
                  Tuticorin District.                                        ... Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/6
                                                                       W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to
                the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent herein on 19.04.2013 in
                Na.Ka.No.D4/49907/2012 and the consequential impugned order passed by the
                2nd respondent herein on 05.06.2013 in Na.Ka.No.339/2012 and quash the same.


                                   For Petitioner             : Mr.R.Vijayakumar

                                   For Respondent Nos.1 & 3   : Mr.A.K.Manickam
                                                                Standing Counsel for Government

                                   For Respondent No.2        : Mr.K.Mahesh Rajan

                                   For Respondent No.4        : Mr.T.Srinivasa Ragavan

                                   For Respondent No.5        : Mr.R.Gowri Shankar

                W.P.(MD)No.10074 of 2013:

                Arulmigu Subramaniyaswamy Devasthanam,
                Tiruchendur through its
                Executive Officer/Joint Commissioner,
                Thiruchendur,
                Tuticorin District.                                            ... Petitioner
                                                      Vs.

                1.The District Collector,
                  Tuticorin District,
                  Tuticorin.
                2.The Executive Officer,
                  Special Grade Panchayat,
                  Thiruchendur,
                  Tuticorin District.
                3.Manalmedu M.Suresh, Ex.M.C.,
                  Ex. Organizer unified D.M.K. Youth Forum,
                  Thiruchendoor,
                  Tuticorin District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                2/6
                                                                          W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

                4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                  Tuticorin.
                5.The Tahsildar,
                  Thiruchendur Taluk,
                  Tuticorin District.                                               ... Respondents

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quash the
                proceedings of the 1st respondent in his order in Na.Ka.No.D4/49907/2012
                dated 19.04.2013 and the same received by the Petitioner Temple on
                23.04.2013.


                                   For Petitioner              : Mr.T.Srinivasaraghavan

                                   For Respondent Nos.1, 4 & 5 : Mr.A.K.Manickam
                                                                 Standing Counsel for Government

                                   For Respondent No.2         : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar

                                   For Respondent No.3   : Mr.R.Gowri Shankar
                                                       *****

COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)

These Writ Petitions have been filed by Arulmigu Subramaniyaswami

Devasthanam, Thiruchendur, presently represented by its Executive

Officer/Joint Commissioner, and an Association formed by the licensees of the

said Temple in respect of the shop buildings on the land comprised in Survey

Nos.119 to 124 of Keela Tiruchendur Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi

District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

2.The order impugned in the Writ Petitions was passed by the District

Collector, Thoothukudi District dated 19.04.2013, holding that the property in

question is a Government property and the Temple has no right over the

property and consequently, there is a threat of eviction of the licensees from the

shops.

3.When W.P.(MD) No.9779 of 2013 was entertained by the Division

Bench, by order dated 19.06.2013, interim stay was granted by taking note of

the submissions made by the Executive Officer of the Special Grade Town

Panchayat of Thiruchendur that they will not take possession till the disposal of

the suit in O.S.No.50 of 2017. The said suit was filed by the Temple for a

declaration of their title over the property. It was initially pending before the

learned District Munsif, Thoothukudi in O.S.No.159 of 2009. Subsequently, the

case has been transferred to District Munsif, Tiruchendur and re-numbered as

O.S.No.50 of 2017 and the learned counsel for the petitioner association

submits that argument in the suit has been completed and judgment has been

reserved.

4.In any event, the title has to be decided in the civil proceedings and

the Temple has rightly approached the Civil Court and the District Collector and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

the Executive Officer of the Panchayat are parties to the suit. The parties may

abide by the judgment passed by the Trial Court. It is needless to say that there

may be appeal against the judgment of the Trial Court as well as Second

Appeal. Therefore, unless and until the title issue is decided, issuance of such

order is not sustained because it is a virtual action rather than a decision to the

title to the property. Therefore, the respondents should wait for the out come

and finality of the civil proceedings.

5.For the above reasons, the Writ Petitions are allowed and the

impugned orders are set aside on the technical ground that the title to the

property be decided in the civil suit pending on the file of the District Munsif,

Thiruchendur and subject to the result of the civil proceedings, it is open to the

respondents to proceed further in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently,

connected Miscellaneous Petitions in W.P.(MD) No.9779 of 2013 are closed.




                Index    :Yes/No                                 [T.S.S., J.]       [S.A.I., J.]
                Internet :Yes                                                07.07.2021
                sj

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

sj To

1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tuticorin.

3.The Tahsildar, Thiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District.

W.P.(MD)Nos.9779 and 10074 of 2013

07.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter