Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Sivalingam
2021 Latest Caselaw 12914 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12914 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Sivalingam on 1 July, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and
                                                                          C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 01.07.2021

                                                     CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                             W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and
                                              C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021

                   1.The State of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary to Government
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
                     Panagal Building
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The Assistant Conservator of Forests
                     Industrial Wood Research Division
                     Mukkombu, Trichy

                   4.The Principal Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                            ... Appellants

                                                        vs

                   P.Sivalingam                                              ... Respondent



                                                      ****
                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 23.08.2016 made in W.P. No.29292 of 2016.
                                                      ****



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                      W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and
                                                                        C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021



                                    For Petitioner       :   Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                             State Government Counsel

                                    For Respondent       :    Ms.K.Jenitha


                                                    JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

dated 23.08.2016 made in W.P. No.29292 of 2016. The appellants

herein are the respondents before the writ court and the respondent

herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent herein was appointed as a temporary plot

watcher in Forest department on 01.09.1979 and his services were

regularised on 10.04.2009 and he retired on 31.07.2016. As his

services were regularised nearly after 30 years, he prayed for

counting of 50% of the temporary services rendered by him along with

his remaining service for the purpose of calculating pension and retiral

benefits by filing a writ of mandamus in W.P. No.29292 of 2015. The

said writ petition was allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A.

Nos.27 and 28 of 2012 dated 11.11.2013. The appellants were

directed to consider and dispose of petitioner's representation based

on the orders passed in the above referred writ appeal in a time bound

manner. It is also to be noted that the said issue of counting 50% of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021

the temporary services rendered by a person for computing the

pensionary benefits is no longer res integra in view of the recent

judgment of the Full Bench of this court in Government of Tamil

Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC

3. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect in its letter and spirit. The

learned counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner affirms

the statement of the learned Government Pleader.

4. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      01.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.1410 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.8710 of 2021

01.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter