Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12898 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021
W.A.No.1659 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.A.No.1659 of 2018
and CMP No.13359 of 2018
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep by Secretary to Government,
Environment and Forest Department,
Fort.St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet,
Chennai – 600 015.
3. The Forest Extension Officer,
Forest Extension Division,
P.K.Agaram, Trichy District.
4. The Principal Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
Teynampet, Chennai - 18 ... Appellants
Vs.
P. Muthu ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letter Patents Act, filed praying
to set aside the final order dated 14.07.2015 in W.P.No.20420 of 2015 passed
by the learned Single Judge.
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.No.1659 of 2018
For Appellants : Mr.R.Neelakandan
State Government Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.I.Kanna patel
JUDGMENT
(delivered by MRS.PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J.,)
The writ petitioner has sought for a mandamus directing the respondents
to count half of the service rendered by him as Plot Watcher from 01.04.1980
to 31.07.2007 along with the regular service as Forest Watcher till the date of
retirement on 31.03.2015 for the purpose of grant of pensionary benefits, which
was disposed of by this Court on 14.07.2015 in W.P.Nos.20420 of 2015,
directing the authorities to implement the same within a period of eight weeks.
2. Aggrieved by the same, writ appeal has been preferred by the State.
3. The question in dispute is no longer res integra as already the Full
Bench of this Court in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu vs
R.Kaliyamoorthy reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705 has held that any person who
has been regularised before the cut-off date i.e., 01.04.2003, is entitled for
pension in view of Proviso to Rule 1(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules,
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1659 of 2018
1978.
4. Admittedly, the respondent was regularised as early as 07.08.2009. In
view of the Full Bench Decision of this Court reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705
(Government of Tamil Nadu vs R.Kaliyamoorthy, the order passed by the
learned Single Judge is confirmed.
5. It is pertinent to note that pursuant to the order of the learned Single
Judge, the Government in G.O.Ms.No.20 dated 28.04.2016 had implemented
the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
6. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ appeal. The writ appeal is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
(P.S.N.J.,) (K.R.J.,) 01.07.2021 sr
Index:yes/no
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.No.1659 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J., AND KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,
sr
W.A.No.1659 of 2018
01.07.2021.
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!