Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 612 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
1 Crl.OP No.20028 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
CRL.O.P.No.20028 of 2020
Malarvendhan ..Petitioner
.Vs.
1.The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate,
and Revenue Divisional Officer,
Krishnagiri,
Krishnagiri District.
2.Inspector of Police,
Town Police Station,
Krishnagiri,
Krishnagiri District.
3.Navaraj ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in connection
with the Na.Ka.No.3786/2020/c dated 09.10.2020 issued by the
1st respondent and quash the same.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2 Crl.OP No.20028 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thiruvengadam
For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.C.Raghavan
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging
the summons issued by the 1st respondent under Section 107 of
Cr.P.C.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the petitioner has already attended the enquiry before the 1st
respondent and the regular functioning of the Church is repeatedly
interfered by the 3rd respondent and the 1st respondent has not
passed any orders under Section 107 Cr.P.C., Proceedings till date.
3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on
behalf of 1st and 2nd respondents submitted that a summon
cannot be made as subject matter of challenge under Section
482 of Cr.P.C., and since the petitioner has already attended the
enquiry, the 1st respondent will take into consideration the
statements collected from the respective parties and necessary https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
action will be taken in accordance with law.
4.In the considered view of this Court, a mere issue of
summon asking the parties to appear for an enquiry cannot be
interfered by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under
Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Useful reference can be made to the
judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in M.Krishnamurthy
and Others Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional
Officer, Krishnagiri and another reported in 2017 (1) MLJ (Crl) 257.
In the present case, the petitioner has already attended the
enquiry after the summon was issued to him.
5.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to
interfere with the impugned summons issued by the 1st
respondent. There shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to
complete the enquiry and pass final orders within a period of four
weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
N.ANAND VENKATESH.J., https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
KP
6.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of
accordingly.
07.01.2021
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
KP
To
1.The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate, and Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.
2.Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.
3.Public Prosecutor High Court, Chennai.
CRL.O.P.No.20028 of 2020
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!