Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 444 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 444 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021

Madras High Court
G.Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Police on 6 January, 2021
                                                                          HCP No. 2328 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 06.01.2021

                                                       Coram

                                        The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH
                                                         and
                                       The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.SIVAGNANAM

                                              H.C.P. No. 2328 of 2020

                     G.Kumar                                               .. Petitioner

                                                         Vs.


                     1.The Commissioner of Police,
                       Greater Chennai Police,
                       No.132, Commissioner Office Building,
                       EVK Sampath Road,
                       Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

                     2.The Inspector of Police,
                       S6, Shankar Nagar Police Station,
                       Pammal, Chennai - 600 075.

                     3.G.Jayachandiran
                     4.Gopal
                     5.G.Jaya                                              .. Respondents


                               Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the second
                     respondent herein to produce his minor granddaughter Jayavarshini,
                     aged about 7 years and grandson Krishanth, aged about 4 years, from
                     the illegal custody of respondents 3 to 5 and handover to the custody
                     of the petitioner.

                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                            HCP No. 2328 of 2020

                                    For Petitioner   :     Mr.N.E.Athipan Raj
                                    For Respondents :      Mr.R.Prathap Kumar,
                                                           Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2

                                                           Mr.P.K.Ganesh for R3 to R5


                                                       ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

Seeking a direction to the second respondent herein to produce

the granddaughter Jayavarshini, aged about 7 years and grandson

Krishanth, aged about 4 years, from the illegal custody of respondents

3 to 5 and to handover their custody to the petitioner, the present

habeas corpus petition has been filed.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter Divya got

married Jayachandiran on 01.06.2012 and through the wedlock they

have two children, Jayavarshini, aged about 7 years and Krishanth,

aged about 4 years. Dhivya committed suicide on 20.09.2020 by

hanging, in connection with which, the police have registered a case in

Crime No.956 of 2020 for the offence under Section 306 IPC against

Jayachandiran and the investigation is pending. While that being so,

this habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ HCP No. 2328 of 2020

custody of the grandchildren on the ground that they were earlier

living with him and that it will be prejudicial to their interest if they

continue to remain with their father, who is the accused in Crime

No.956 of 2020. In support of this contention, learned counsel placed

reliance upon the judgments in (i)Tejaswini Gaud and Others Vs.

Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and Others ((2019) 7 SCC 42)

and (ii)Shaurya Gautam and Another Vs. State of U.P. and

Others (2020 SCC Online All 1372).

3.The fact remains that Jayachandiran is the father of two

children and at present, the custody of the children is with him. In

Tejaswini's case (cited supra), the Supreme Court handed over the

custody of the child from the aunt of the child to the father holding

that the father being the natural guardian would be entitled to custody.

However, the Supreme Court has stated that in matters of custody, the

paramount interest of the child should be taken into account by the

Court. In this case, the custody of the two children with Jayachandiran

cannot be stated to be illegal inasmuch as he is the father and natural

guardian.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ HCP No. 2328 of 2020

4.Hence this habeas corpus petition is closed with liberty to the

petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.

(P.N.P.,J.) (V.S.G.,J.) 06.01.2021 Index: Yes/No mmi

To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, No.132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

2.The Inspector of Police, S6, Shankar Nagar Police Station, Pammal, Chennai - 600 075.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ HCP No. 2328 of 2020

P.N.PRAKASH, J.

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

mmi

H.C.P. No. 2328 of 2020

06.01.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter