Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 435 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021
WP No.20484 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
WP No. 20484 of 2020
S.Chelladurai ... Petitioner
vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
SP Office Campus,
Ariyalur District,
Ariyalur.
2. Inspector of Police,
Udayarpalayam Police Station,
Ariyalur District,
Ariyalur. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove
the petitioner name, image displayed in H.S.No. Not known, from the
History Sheet Book maintained by the second respondent by considering
petitioner's representation dated 06.11.2020.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
WP No.20484 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Arun Dattan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of
mandamus directing the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner
from the history sheet records maintained by the second respondent in HS
No.403 of 2011.
2. The case of the petitioner is that an FIR came to be registered
against the petitioner and others and ultimately it resulted in a session case
in SC No.2 of 2011 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge,
Ariyalur. The case ended in acquittal by virtue of a judgment dated
02.11.2012. The further case of the petitioner is that based on this Criminal
case, the second respondent had opened a history sheet against the petitioner
in HS No.403 of 2011 and the name of the petitioner has not been deleted in
spite of the representation made by the petitioner. Left with no other option,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.20484 of 2020
the present writ petition has been filed before this Court seeking for
appropriate directions.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.
4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,
there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the
representation made by the petitioner on 06.11.2020, in accordance with the
guidelines given by this Court in Sabari Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
of Police, Madurai City and Ors., reported in (2018) 4 MLJ (Crl) 585, and
in Thirumagan and Ors. Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai
District and Ors., reported in (2020) 2 LW (Crl) 266. The entire process
shall be completed by the second respondent within a period of six weeks
from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to
make a fresh representation to the second respondent along with a copy of
this order.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.20484 of 2020
5. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No
costs.
06.01.2020
Internet: Yes/No Index: Yes/No speaking order/ Non Speaking order
jv
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, SP Office Campus, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
2. Inspector of Police, Udayarpalayam Police Station, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.20484 of 2020
N.ANAND VENKATESH,J.,
jv
WP No. 20484 of 2020
06.01.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!