Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5198 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016 and
CMP.No.20269 of 2016
Kamatchi Ammal ..Petitioner
Vs.
Saroja ..Respondent
PRAYER:
The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC
praying against the fair and decretal order of the learned Subordinate
Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District dated 08.03.2013 in IA.No.618
of 2012 in IA.No.763 of 2009 in OS.No.104 of 2006.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Hariharan
For Respondent : Mr.B.Vijayakumar
ORDER
This civil revision petition is filed against the fair and
decretal order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur
District dated 08.03.2013 in IA.No.618 of 2012 in IA.No.763 of 2009 in
OS.No.104 of 2006 thereby allowing the petition to receive the
unregistered and unstamped family arrangement deed in the final decree
proceedings.
2. The petitioner is the plaintiff. She filed suit for partition
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016
in respect of the suit property as against the respondent and three others,
in which the respondent is the fourth defendant. The suit was decreed by
the judgment and decree dated 23.06.2009 in which all the parties were
allotted 1/5 share in the suit schedule property. Thereafter the petitioner
filed petition for final decree in IA.No.763 of 2009. In the final decree
application, Advocate Commissioner was appointed and he also submitted
his report with plan. At that juncture, the respondent / fourth defendant
filed petition to receive document alleged to have been executed by the
petitioner dated 18.05.2011 thereby the petitioner released her right in
favour of the respondent and other two brothers by the unregistered and
unstamped deed. The court below allowed the petition and received the
said document for the reason that the said document was executed by the
petitioner and other sister and brothers and it is a family arrangement
deed. Admittedly, the said document is an unstamped and unregistered
one. That apart, the petitioner denied the very execution of the said
document dated 18.05.2011 thereby released her right in respect of her
1/5 share in the suit property in favour of her brothers and the respondent
herein.
3. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016
petitioner, the said document dated 18.05.2011 is inadmissible in evidence
even for collateral purpose, since it is unstamped and unregistered one.
Without considering the above, the court below allowed the petition.
Therefore, the order passed by the court below is perverse, illegal and
liable to be set aside.
4. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is allowed and the
order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District
dated 08.03.2013 in IA.No.618 of 2012 in IA.No.763 of 2009 in OS.No.104
of 2006 is set aside. Further, the court below is directed to pass final
decree within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No
order as to costs.
26.02.2021
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
lok
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016
lok
To
The Subordinate Judge,
Dharapuram, Tiruppur District
CRP.NPD.No.4016 of 2016
26.02.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!