Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4756 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.6878 of 2020
M.Karuppasamy ... Appellant
Vs.
1.The Governor,
Reserve Bank of India,
Mumbai.
2.The Zonal Manager,
HDFC Bank,
North Veli Street,
Madurai.
3.The Branch Manager,
HDFC Bank,
Rajapalayam Branch,
Tenkasi Road,
Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent, against the
dated 09.12.2020, passed in W.P.(MD)No.712 of 2020.
For Appellant : Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan
For Respondents : Mrs.A.Banumathy
for Mr.A.Anbalakan
http://www.judis.nic.in
1/4
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
JUDGEMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
The appellant filed the Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus,
directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation made by the appellant,
by accepting the monthly installments.
2.Pursuant to the hire purchase agreement, followed by violation, the
vehicle was seized by the respondents. The appellant made some payment
initially, followed by some more demand. Now, the learned counsel appearing
for the appellant submitted that the appellant has paid a sum of Rs.12,44,120/-.
However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the
due as on today is Rs.10,65,398/- by way of E.M.I. and the foreclosure amount
is Rs.21,11,287/-. Therefore, the request is not feasible for consideration.
3.As rightly submitted by the learned Single Judge, we have no role to
play in this matter. Though the learned counsel appearing for the appellant
quoted the Pandemic situation, the respondent is not amenable and the
transaction is commercial. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere
with the order of the learned Single Judge. However, our order will not stand in
the way of the respondents to consider the appellant's request. The appellant is
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
at liberty to approach the respondents within a week. We hope and trust, the
request of the appellant will be considered by the respondents in accordance
with law.
4.This Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Index :Yes/No [M.M.S.J.,] [S.A.I.J.,]
Internet :Yes 23.02.2021
smn2
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
AND S.ANANTHI, J.
smn2
W.A.(MD)No.1234 of 2020
23.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!