Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4754 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
1.Basheer Ahamathu
2.M.P.Abdul Kader Jailani
3.Mathar Fathima
4.K.Peer Fathimal ... Appellants
Vs.
1.Natarajan
2.Premavathi @ Prema
3.Minor Muthusamy
4.M.R.Anburaja ...Respondents
PRAYER:This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.61 of 2000,
dated 27.04.2001 on the file of the I Additional District Court-Cum-Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.97
of 1996, dated 13.12.1999 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court,
Tirunelveli.
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
For appellants : Mr.A.Sankara Subramanian
For R1 : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan
For R2 to R4 : No Appearance
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed
in A.S.No.61 of 2000, dated 27.04.2001 on the file of the I Additional District
Court-Cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgment and
decree passed in O.S.No.97 of 1996, dated 13.12.1999 on the file of the Principal
District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
2.The learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo, dated 29.01.2021.
3.Perused the memo and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
reported in (2003) 9 SCC 606 (Banarsi and Others Vs.Ram Phal) submitted by
the learned counsel for the appellants.
http://www.judis.nic.in S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
4.In view of the Order 41 Rule 22 r/w Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code,
this Second Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. The memo, dated
29.01.2021 is recorded. No costs.
23.02.2021
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsd
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The I Additional District Court-Cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
3.The Section Officer, V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
S.KANNAMMAL, J.
vsd
S.A.(MD)No.36 of 2005
23.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!