Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.The Oriental Insurance ... vs P.Periyammal
2021 Latest Caselaw 4697 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4697 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.The Oriental Insurance ... vs P.Periyammal on 23 February, 2021
                                                           1

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 23.02.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI

                                            C.M.A(MD)No.430 of 2018
                                                     and
                                            CMP(MD)No.5339 of 2018

                     M/s.The Oriental Insurance Company Limited,
                     Divisional Office,
                     1st Floor, Loyola Building,
                     Salai Road,
                     Dindigul-624 001.                   : Appellant/2nd Respondent

                                                         Vs.

                     1.P.Periyammal
                     2.R.Paraman
                     3.P.Kiruthika                              : R1 to R3/Petitioners 1 to 3
                     4.C.Murali                                 : R4/1st Respondent

                               PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under
                     Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the award, dated
                     04.11.2017 made in MCOP No.265 of 2014 on the file of Motor
                     Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court). Kulithalai.


                                    For Appellant          : Mr.K.Bhaskaran

                                    For R1 to R3           : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj

                                    For 4th Respondent     : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                          2

                                                    JUDGMENT

Challenge made in this appeal is to the award passed by the

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Kulithalai, in MCOP

No.265 of 2014, dated 04.11.2017.

2.The short facts of the case is that on 04.08.2014 at about

6.40 pm, on Musiri-Velakanatham Main Road near Naicker

Thottam, the deceased Prasanth was riding his TVS Sport Motor

cycle TN-47-U-3180 along with his friends Gobi and Balamurugan,

at that time, a Eicher Milk Van TN-57-M-7670 came in a rash and

negligent manner and dashed against the Two Wheeler. Due to the

impact, the deceased Prasanth and his two friends fell down from

the vehicle and sustained fatal injuries, while the deceased

Prasanth, died on the spot. The claimants, being the legal heirs of

the deceased filed a claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.

20,00,000/- on the ground that the driver of the Eicher Lorry was

responsible for the accident.

3.The claimants have stated that at the time of accident, the

deceased was working as Car Driver in a private company and was

earring Rs.25,000/- per month. A criminal case in Crime No.291 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

2014 was registered against the driver of the Eicher Lorry by

Murisi Police.

4.The claim was opposed by the appellant Insurance

Company disputing the manner of accident and their liability to pay

compensation.

5.The Tribunal, upon consideration of oral and documentary

evidence, came to the conclusion that the driver of the Lorry was

responsible for the accident and awarded compensation of Rs.

13,81,000/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. Challenging the award of the

tribunal, the Insurance Company is before this court as appellant.

6.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on

record.

7.The manner of the accident and the finding on negligence

are not in dispute and the appeal is confined only to quantum of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

8.It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that

the tribunal has failed to note that the practice of deduction

towards personal and living expenses of the deceased, 1/3rd of the

income if the deceased was married and one half (50%) of the

income of the deceased was a bachelor and and the tribunal has

wrongly added 50% future prospects, instead of 40% as the

deceased was on a fixed salary and the monthly income fixed by the

tribunal is on the higher side and in respect of conventional head,

the award of the tribunal is also on the higher side. On the other

hand, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent/claimant submitted

that the income fixed by the tribunal is on the lower side since the

deceased was died at the age of 23 and in respect of other heads,

the compensation is to be enhanced to some extent.

9.It is not in dispute that at the time of the accident, the

deceased was aged about 23 years and he was working as a Car

Driver in a Private Company namely Vinayaka Drugs Company,

Trichy and he was a bachelor. PW1 has stated that the deceased

was working as a Car Driver and he was earning a sum of Rs.

25,000/- per month. However, no reliable document has been

produced to that effect. Hence, the tribunal assessed the income of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

the deceased at Rs.6,000/- per month and by applying proper

multiplier, has awarded a sum of Rs.13,50,000/- towards loss of

income.

10.Perusal of the records would reveal that the deceased was

working as a Car Driver. Considering the above facts and the age

of the deceased at the time of the accident, the court fixed the

notional income of the deceased at Rs.7,000/- per month. By adding

40% towards future prospects, the monthly loss of income of the

deceased is calculated at Rs.9,800/- (Rs.7,000/- + 2,800/-). Since

the deceased is a bachelor, after deducting 50% towards his

personal and living expenses and by applying proper multiplier '18',

this court awards Rs.10,58,400/- (Rs.4,900/- x 12 x 15) towards

loss of income. In addition to that , as per the decisions in the case

of Pranay Sethi & Megma General Insurnce Company), this

Court awards Rs.40,000/- towards parental consotirum to the

claimants 1 and 2; Rs.15,000/- towards loss of amenities adn Rs.

15,000/- towards futuneral expenses In total, the claimants would

be entitled for Rs.11,68,400/- together with interest @ 7.5% p.a.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

30.With the above observation, the Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal is partly allowed. The award is reduced to Rs.11,68,400/-

from Rs.13,81,000/-. The appellant Insurance Company is directed

to deposit the modified award amount together with accrued

interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, within a

period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. On such compliance, the claimants are entitled to

withdraw their respective share as per the ratio fixed by the

tribunal, with accrued interest and costs, without filing any formal

petition before the tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

23.02.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No er

To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ The Sub Court, Karur.

2.The Record Keeper, V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

T.KRISHNAVALLI.J.,

er

C.M.A(MD)No.430 of 2018

23.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter