Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary To Government vs K.Asuvathi
2021 Latest Caselaw 4591 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4591 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Madras High Court
The Secretary To Government vs K.Asuvathi on 22 February, 2021
                                                       1

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 22.02.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                AND
                               THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

                                          W.A(MD)NO.546 OF 2012
                                                  and
                                           M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012


                      1.The Secretary to Government,
                        Personnel and Administrative Reforms and
                        Administrative Reforsm(M) Department,
                        Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Chennai-9.

                      2.The Director of Elementary Education,
                        Chennai-6.

                      3.The District Elementary Education Officer,
                        Thanjavur.                             :AppellantsRespondents


                                              .vs.


                      K.Asuvathi                                 : Respondent/Petitioner

                      PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                      praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in
                      W.P(MD)No.304 of 2012, dated 03.04.2012.


                                   For Appellants          :Mrs.S.Srimathy
                                                            Special Govt.Pleader

                                   For Respondent          :Mr.D.Rameh Kumar
                                                           forM/s.S.Deenadhayalan


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                         2

                                                JUDGMENT

*************

[Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]

This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by this

Court in W.,P(MD)No.3804 of 2012,dated 03.04.2012.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.The Writ Petitioner was promoted as Graduate Teacher on

14.06.2008, as per G.O.Ms.No.180, Personnel and adminstrative

Reforms Department, dated 11.09.2000 on the ground that the

degree awarded by the Open University could be accepted for

appointment and promotion This was stalled pursuant to the

issuance of G.O.Ms.No.107, dated 18.8.2000, stating that any

degree obtained in an Open University without passing 10+2+3

pattern cannot be used for public appontment or for promotion. It

is later found that the Writ petitioner had passed 11th standard in

pre- unitersity system and then completed her graduation.

4.The Writ Petitioner was promoted as Headmaster of

Middle School on 16.09.2011 and posted at Municipal Middle

School at Thanjavur, however, the third respondent without

http://www.judis.nic.in

noticing the facts that the Petitioner has completed her S.S.L.C

and diploma in Teacher Education and B.Lit decree through Open

University, which conferred equal status to the Open Unitersity

graduation, demoted the Petitioner to the level of Headmster of

Primary School. The said order was under challenge in the present

Writ Petition. Based on the said G.O.Ms.No.180, Personnal and

Adminstrarive Records Department, dated 18.8.2020, the learned

Single Judge had categorically held that those persons who were

promoted already cannot be reverted back and on the said reason,

the impugned order was quashed. The challenge is now made by

the authorities. The learned Special Government Pleader who

appeard for the appellants stated that the Writ Petitioner/Teacher

had attained the age of superannuation and received all her retiral

benefits as per the order of the learned Single Judge and as such,

nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter.

5.Accordingly, the Writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Conseqquently connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismised.

[P.S.N.,J.] & [S.K.,J.] 22.02.2021

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn

http://www.judis.nic.in

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

http://www.judis.nic.in

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA J.

AND S.KANNAMMAL, J.

vsn

JUDGMENT MADE IN

W.A(MD)NO.546 OF 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012

http://www.judis.nic.in

22.02.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter