Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Periyakkal vs Tamil Nadu State Transport ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4463 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4463 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Madras High Court
M.Periyakkal vs Tamil Nadu State Transport ... on 22 February, 2021
                                                           1

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   Dated: 22.02.2021

                                                        CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI

                                                CMA(MD)No.524 of 2016

                     1.M.Periyakkal
                     2.M.Meenal
                     3.Minor M.Nirosha
                     4.Minor M.Asha
                     5.Minor M.Anusha
                       Appellants 3 to 5 are minors
                       represented through their
                       mother M.Periyakkal 1st appellant)        : Appellants/Petitioners

                                                          Vs.


                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited
                     represented through the Managing Director,
                     having Divisional Office at
                     Tirunelveli Region,
                     Tirunelveli.                         : Respondent/Respondent



                                   PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under

                     Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against          the award,

                     dated 02.12.2015 made in MCOP No.503 of 2015 on the file of the

                     Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (VI Additional District Court),

                     Madurai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                           2

                                          For Appellants       : Mr.M.Sarangan
                                          For Respondent       : Mr.P.Prabhakaran


                                                 JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed challenging

the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (VI

Additional District Court), Madurai, dated 02.12.2015 made in

MCOP No.503 of 2015.

2.The short facts of the case is that on 10.11.2014 at about

4.15 am, when the deceased Malaisamy was travelling from

Dharmapuri to Thiruppur as a passenger in TNSTC Bus TN-29-

N-2544 belonged to Dharmapuri Division and the front tyre of the

said bus got punctured and hence, the driver of the bus parked the

vehicle on the left side of the road and changing the tyre and the

deceased Malaisamy and others were standing near the punctured

bus, at that time, the bus TN-72-N-1840 came in a rash and

negligent manner on the same road from north to south direction

and hit on the back side of the punctured bus rolled down into the

pond. Due to the accident, the deceased Malaisamy was thrown

away on the road and sustained serious injuries and died on the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

spot. The legal heirs of the deceased filed a claim petition seeking

compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- for the death of the deceased due

to the accident.

3.The claimants have stated that the deceased was 47 years

at the time of accident and he was doing Government Sub-

Contractor and Agriculturist, thereby he was earning Rs.5,00,000/-

per year.

4.In the counter filed by the Transport Corporation, they

disputed the manner of accident and their liability to pay

compensation.

5.The Tribunal, on consideration of oral and documentary

evidence adduced by the parties, came to the conclusion that the

driver of the offending vehicle (TN-72-N-1840) has caused the

accident and awarded compensation of Rs.9,62,000/- together with

interest @ 7.5% p.a.

6.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on

record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

7.The manner of the accident and the finding on negligence

are not in dispute and the appeal is confined only to quantum of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

8.The learned counsel for the appellants/claimants mainly

argued that the tribunal erred in awarding lesser quantum of

compensation to the claimants and failed to award a fair

compensation and the tribunal ought to have adopted correct

multiplier and erred in not taking into account the future monetary

benefits and erred in arriving at the lesser monthly income for the

deceased and the award of the tribunal under the conventional

heads are also on the lower side, hence, the award of the tribunal

has to be enhanced.

9.On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent

submitted that the award is reasonable, which does not warrant

any interference of this court.

10.It is not in dispute that the deceased died at the age of 47

years. Since no reliable document has been filed on the side of the

claimants to prove the income of the deceased, the tribunal has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

fixed the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.6000/-. By applying

multiplier '13' and after deducting 1/4th from the salary of the

deceased for his personal expenses, the tribunal has awarded Rs.

7,02,000/- towards loss of dependency. Further, the tribunal has

awarded Rs.5,000/- towards transportation; Rs25,000/- for funeral

expenses; Rs.30,000/- towards loss of consortium to the 1st

claimant; Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of love and affection to the

claimants and Rs.50,000/- towards loss of future prospects and loss

of expectation of life. In total, the tribunal has awarded Rs.

9,62,000/- to the claimants along with interest @ 7.5% p.a.

11.Perusal of the records would reveal that the deceased was

doing Sub Contractor work in the Government Department and also

doing agricultural work, there he was earning Rs.3,00,000/- per

annum. Since no reliable document has been produced to prove the

income of the deceased, the tribunal has fixed the monthly income

of the deceased as Rs.6,000/-. In this case, even though, no

document has been produced on the side of the claimants,

considering the fact that the deceased was heal and health at the

time of the accident and keeping in view of the decision of the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Syed Sadiq Vs. Divisional

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2014(1) TN MAC

459 (SC), this court fixed the notional income of the deceased at

Rs.6,500/- per month.

12.It is settled law that in case the deceased was self-

employed or on a fixed salary, an addition of 25% of the established

income should be the warrant where the deceased was between the

age 40 to 50 years. In the instant case, the tribunal has not added

any amount towards future prospects. Hence, this court is of the

considered view that 25% has to be added towards future prospects

to calculate the income of the deceased, as per the decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017(6) CTC 493 (National

Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others). By

doing so, the monthly loss of income of the deceased is calculated

at Rs.8,125/- (Rs.6,500/- + Rs.1,625/-). After deducting 1/4th

towards his personal and living expenses, the monthly income is

arrived at Rs.6,094/- (Rs.9,100/- x 1/4). By applying proper

multipler 13, this court awards Rs.9,50,664/- (Rs.6,094/- x 12 x

13) towards loss of income. In addition to that, as per the decision

in Pranay Sethi's case, this Court awards Rs.40,000/- towards

loss of consortium to the 1st claimant; Rs.15,000/- towards loss of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

estate and Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses. In total, the

claimants would be entitled for Rs.10,20,664/- together with

interest @ 7.5% p.a.

13.In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly

allowed. The award is enhanced to Rs.10,20,664/- from Rs.

9,62,000/-. The respondent Transport Corporation is directed to

deposit the modified award amount together with interest @ 7.5%

p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit, less the

amount already deposited, within a period of six weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such compliance, the

1st claimant is entitled to withdraw Rs.5,20,664/- and the 2nd

claimant is entitled to withdraw Rs.1,10,000/- with accrued interest

and costs without filing any formal petition before the tribunal. The

minor claimants 3 to 5 are entitled to Rs.1,30,000/- each. Insofar

as the share of the minor claimants is concerned, the Tribunal is

directed to deposit their share in any one of the Nationalised Bank,

in a fixed deposit scheme initially for a period of three years

renewable thereafter, till they attain majority. The 1st

claimant/being the mother and guardian of minors is permitted to

withdraw the accrued interest once in three months directly from

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

the Bank for the welfare of the minor children. The claimants shall

pay the additional court fee for the enhanced amount. No costs.

                     Index:Yes/No                                        22.02.2021
                     Internet:Yes/No

                     er




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/


                                                                    T.KRISHNAVALLI,J

                                                                                   er


                     To,

                     1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/

VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai.

2.The Record Keeper, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Judgement made in CMA(MD)No.524 of 2016

22.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter