Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager vs Dhanam
2021 Latest Caselaw 4285 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4285 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021

Madras High Court
The Branch Manager vs Dhanam on 19 February, 2021
                                                       C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and
                                                         C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                            DATED: 19.02.2021

                                   CORAM:

      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

                         C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016
                                  and
                         C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

The Branch Manager,
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Kallakurichi,
Villupuram District.                                          .. Appellant


                                   Vs.

1.Dhanam
2.Priya
3.Ayyanar
4.Ayyakkannu
5.Anjalai                                                    .. Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in
M.C.O.P.No.276 of 2011 on 30.11.2015 on the file of the learned Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge) of Kallakurichi, at Villupuram
District .



1/8
                                                              C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and
                                                                C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

                     For Appellant       : Mr. J. Chandran

                     For Respondents : Mr. K. Suryanarayanan

                                 JUDGMENT

The appeal has been filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,

challenging the Award dated 3011.2015 passed by the Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi at Villupuram District.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal are as follows:

(i) The deceased Manivel was riding a TVS Star City motor cycle

bearing Registration No.TN-09-AM-6674 along with his friends on

03.05.2011. On the Salem main road, opposite to Suseela Teacher Training

Institute, due to negligent parking of the lorry bearing Registration No.TN-

32-L-1161 without any parking signal, the motorcycle dashed behind the

lorry.

(ii) Manivel died on 03.05.2011, as a result of an accident caused by a

lorry bearing registration No.TN 32 L 1161 insured with the appellant

Insurance Company. The dependents of the deceased Manivel who are the

respondents 1 to 5 in the appeal preferred a claim before the Motor Accident

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.276 of 2011 seeking a compensation of

Rs.8,00,000/- for the death caused to Manivel as a result of the accident.

(iii) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal by its Award dated

30.11.2015 in M.C.O.P.No.276 of 2011 directed the Appellant Oriental

Insurance Company to pay the respondents 1 to 5 a sum of Rs.11,97,000/-

together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of the claim till the date of

realization.

3. Aggrieved by the Award dated 30.11.2015, the appeal has been

filed by the Insurance Company.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned

counsel for the respondents.

5. The learned counsel for the respondents/claimants would

contend that the claim petition has been filed under Section 163 (A) of Motor

Vehicles Act, it can be converted into Section 166(A) of the MV Act and

relied upon the judgment reported in AIR 2009 SC 3056 – Ningamma and

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

others Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited. Further, he contended

that the accident had taken place due to the wrong parking of the lorry of the

appellant/Insurance Company on the road and for conversion of petition

under Section 166(A) of MV Act has to be established that the accident had

taken place only due to the reason that four persons had travelled in a two

wheeler, driven by the deceased at the time of the accident and he also relied

upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in

2020 (1) TNMAC 161 – Mohammed Siddique and another Vs. National

Insurance Company Limited and others.

6. Perused Ex.R3/Rough sketch. After perusing rough sketch, I

find that an opportunity must be given to the claimants.

7. The learned counsel for the respondents relied upon the

following judgments:

(i) 2018(1) TNMAC 745 (SC) – Nishan Singh Vs. Oriental Insurance

Company Limited

(ii) 1992 (1) LW 25

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

(iii) 2005 (1) TNMAC 201 – National Insurance Company Limited,

Chennai Vs. S.Rajesh

8. After hearing both the counsels and after perusing the records, I

find that the petition may be treated under Section 163 (A), of the MV Act in

the interest of justice. The annual income of the deceased is fixed as

Rs.40,000/-. Taking into consideration the age of the deceased at the time of

accident, multiplier method 18 is adopted and 1/3rd deduction only is

permissible. Accordingly, loss of income due to the death of the deceased to

the claim petitioners are be assessed as Rs.40,000/-X18X2/3 = Rs.4,80,000/-.

Rs.9,500 towards Loss of love and affection, funeral charges and loss of

estate.

9. So far as the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other

heads are concerned, the same are modified to the extent as indicated infra.

      Sl.No.         Heads           Tribunal Award        High Court
           1 Loss of Dependency    Rs.9,72,000/-          Rs.4,80,000/-
           2 Loss of Estate        Rs.10,000/-                  -
           3 Loss of Consortium    Rs.1,00,000/-                -


                                                          C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and
                                                            C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016


      Sl.No.           Heads         Tribunal Award      High Court
             Loss of Love and Rs.1,00,000/-
           4 Affection
             Funeral           and Rs.25,000/-            Rs.9,500
           5 Transportation
               Total               Rs.11,97,000/-     Rs.4,89,500/-



The amount awarded by the Tribunal under different heads, on

summation it comes out to Rs.12,07,000/-, which is wrongly mentioned as

Rs.11,97,000/- in the lower Court record.

10. Consequently, the total compensation amount of Rs.11,97,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal is hereby modified and reduced to Rs.4,89,500/-.

The appellant/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the modified

compensation amount of Rs.4,89,500/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period

of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and on such

deposit, the claimants are permitted to withdraw the entire award amount by

filing an appropriate application and the payments are to be made through

RTGS. Thus, the award dated 30.11.2015, passed in M.C.O.P.No.276/2011,

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

stands modified and C.M.A.No.1529/2016 stands allowed in part.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

19.02.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No AT

To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.

AT

C.M.A.No.1529 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11662 of 2016

19.02.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter