Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4105 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
W.A(MD)NO.1206 OF 2012
and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
1.The District Collector,
Collectorate Building,
Madurai.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Madurai.
3.The District Planning Officer,
The Office of the District Planning,
Melamadai,
Madurai.
4.The Child Development Planning Officer,
The Office of the Child Development Planning,
Alanganallur,
Madurai District. :Appellants/Respondents
.vs.
S.Lourthumary : Respondent/Petitioner
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in
W.P(MD)No.12149 of 2012, dated 11.10.2012.
For Appellants :Mr.M.Murugan
Govt.Advocate
For Respondent :Mr.S.Moorthy
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
JUDGMENT
*************
[Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by this
Court in W.P(MD)No.12149 of 2012, dated 11.10.2012, in allowing
the Writ Petition by setting aside the order of suspension.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and
perused the materials placed before this Court.
3.The order of the learned Single Judge is by setting aside
the original order of suspension by giving liberty to the
appellants herein to proceed against the respondent herein/Writ
Petitioner for his misconduct, if so advised, in accordance with the
rules.. etc.
4.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned
Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the the appellants
would submit that the respondent herein/Writ Petitioner was re-
instated into service and she was allowed to retire from service on
31.12.2013 and she has also been disbursed with the GPF and
other retiral benefits. It is further submitted that the
respondent/Writ Petitioner is no-more. Therefore nothing that
http://www.judis.nic.in
survives for adjudication in this Writ Appeal.
5.In view of the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous
Petition is dismissed.
[P.S.N.,J.] & [S.K.,J.] 17.02.2021
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
vsn
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
http://www.judis.nic.in
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA J.
AND S.KANNAMMAL, J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1206 OF 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
17.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!