Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4086 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021
W.A.No.1786 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.A.No.1786 of 2018
1.M.Liyagath Ali
2.Thowlath Unnisa .. Appellants
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Villupuram.
2.The Tahsildar,
Ulundurpet,
Villupuram District. .. Respondents
Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
common judgment dated 27.11.2013 made in W.P.No.27773 of 2013.
For Appellants : Mr.T.Gandhi
For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
State Government Pleader
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.1786 of 2018
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The appeal is directed against an order of November 11,
2013, by which the appellants' writ petition has been dismissed
primarily on the ground that the appellants had purported to
question an order passed by the District Collector which was
founded on the classification of the land in question.
2. According to the appellants, and as has been recorded in
the order impugned, the land was classified otherwise and was
purported to be changed to Adi Dravidar Punjai Tharisu. The
appellants claim that the appellants had no knowledge of the
alteration in the classification, nor were the appellants given any
notice in such regard.
3. The Writ Court, quite appropriately, held that as long as the
land remained classified as it was, no right of the appellants could
be recognised in respect thereof. The order impugned is
unimpeachable in such regard.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1786 of 2018
4. The appellants say that they have now applied for re-
classification of the land. If such is the case, the application for re-
classification apparently filed by the appellants may be proceeded
with and considered in accordance with law uninfluenced by the
order impugned herein. In the event the appellants succeed in
having the land re-classified, the appellants should not be
prejudiced or denied any benefits due to the appellants only by
virtue of the judgment and order impugned.
WA.No.1786 of 2018 is disposed of with the above
observation and without interfering with the order impugned at this
stage. There will be no order as to costs.
(S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
17.02.2021
Index : No
sasi
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1786 of 2018
To:
1.The District Collector, Villupuram.
2.The Tahsildar, Ulundurpet, Villupuram District.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1786 of 2018
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.1786 of 2018
17.02.2021
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!