Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

J.Jayapal vs The Superintendent Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 4034 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4034 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2021

Madras High Court
J.Jayapal vs The Superintendent Of Police on 17 February, 2021
                                                                                WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020



                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED: 17.02.2021

                                                        CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

                                              WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020

                      J.Jayapal                                                   ... Petitioner
                                                          Vs.

                      1.The Superintendent of Police,
                        Theni District,
                        Theni.

                      2.The Inspector of Police,
                        Thevaram Police Station,
                        Theni District.                                        ... Respondents
                      PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                      India to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                      pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the second respondent dated
                      19.12.2020 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant
                      permission and provide adequate police protection to conduct Double
                      Bullock Cart Race at Thevaram Village, Theni District.
                                  For Petitioner             :Mr.A.Arputharaj
                                  For Respondents            :Mr.R.Saravanakumar
                                                     Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
                                                      ORDER

The present petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings

http://www.judis.nic.in WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020

dated 19.12.2020 of second respondent and consequently, to grant

permission and adequate police protection to conduct Bullock Cart Race

in connection with Pongal festival at Thevaram Village, Theni District.

2.A Division Bench of this Court in K.Ganesan Vs.,

Superintendent of Police and others reported in 2017 SCC Online Mad

3085 has held as follows:

"4.Bulls are basically Draught and Pack animals. This has been statutorily recognised in the Prevention of Cruelty to Draught and Pack Animals Rules, 1965. Draught means an animal used for pulling heavy loads. Since, bulls have a large abdomen and thorax and the entire body has a resemblance of a barrel shape, the ability to run is limited. Bulls are cloven footed (two digits) animals and two digits in each leg can comfortably bear weight only when they are walking and not running. Anatomically bulls are not meant to take part in racing. That is why, Rule 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transportation of Animals on Foot) Rules, 2001 states that no person shall use a whip or a stick in order to force the animal to walk or to hasten the pace of their walk. This Court can take judicial notice of the fact that various kinds of physical torture are inflicted on bulls in order to make them run. For instance, they are poked with nail- studded sticks during the races. Powders that have a burning effect are applied on their private parts. They are subjected to extreme trauma.

5.Article 51 A(g) mandates that it shall be the duty of every citizen of India to have compassion for living creatures. Section 3 of Prevention of Cruelty of Animal Act,

http://www.judis.nic.in WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020

1960 states that it shall be the duty of every person having the care or charge of any animal to take all reasonable measures to ensure the well-being of such animal and to prevent the infliction upon such animal of unnecessary pain or suffering. Section 11(1) the Act penalises any person, who beats, kicks, overrides, overdrives,, tortures or otherwise treats any animal so as to subject it to unnecessary pain or suffering. It cannot be disputed that in a bullock cart race, the animal would be beaten, kicked, overridden, over driven and tortured. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot grant permission to do an act that is amounting to an offence.

6.The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 2014(7) SCC 547 (Animal Welfare Board of India V. Nagaraja) deserves to be taken note of at this juncture. The Apex Court has noted the paredigm shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism. Animal rights and welfare have now gained recognition internationally. The said judgment points out that every species has a right to life and security. Article 21 of the Constitution of India has been expansively interpreted so as to include even animal life. Life means something more than mere survival. Animals' well being and welfare have been statutorily recognized under Sections 3 and 11 of the Act and the rights framed under the Act. The right to dignity and fair treatment is confined not only to human beings alone, but, also extended to animals as well. The right not to be beaten, kicked, over ridden or over loaded is also a right recognised by Section 11 read with Section 3 of the Act. The Honourable Supreme Court has also held that bulls race causes considerable pain, stress and strain on the bulls."

R.HEMALATHA, J.

rmk

http://www.judis.nic.in WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020

3.In view of the clear decision made by the Division Bench of

this Court that the Bullock Cart Race cannot be permitted to be

conducted, the present Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

17.02.2021 rmk

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes Speaking/Non-Speaking order Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thevaram Police Station, Theni District.

WP(MD)No.19900 of 2020

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter