Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3137 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2021
W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.714 of 2021
The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
Karaikudi Region,
Rep. by its General Manager,
Karaikudi. : Appellant
Vs.
1.M.Iqbal
2.The Administrator,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust,
Thiruvalluvar Illam,
Anna Salai,
Chennai – 2. : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the
order dated 10.02.2020 made in W.P.(MD)No.27313 of 2019.
For Appellant : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan
*****
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This is a second round of litigation, after the award passed in favour of the
writ petitioner has become final inter se parties.
2. The writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner on the premise that
the period commencing from 18.09.2008 to 30.04.2018 has to be treated as
in-service, though he is not entitled for the backwages for the same. This claim has
been made in tune with the award, as confirmed by this Court. The learned Single
Judge accordingly allowed the writ petition.
3. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that having
received the benefits and reached the age of superannuation, it is not open to the
writ petitioner to make such claim.
4. The said submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the
appellant does not find favour with us. What the writ petitioner seeks is the benefit
in tune with the award. The award, as confirmed by this Court, disentitle the writ
petitioner from getting the salary, but, he is deemed to be in continuation of
http://www.judis.nic.in W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
service. Once the said issue has already been dealt with in favour of the writ
petitioner, the consequent will have to flow from it. Therefore, the said period has
to be taken as continuation of service and on that basis, the resultant benefits will
have to be given to the writ petitioner.
5. In such view of the matter, we do not find any merit in this writ appeal
and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes / No [M.M.S.,J.] [S.A.I.,J.]
Internet : Yes 09.02.2021
gk
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
AND
S.ANANTHI, J.
gk
W.A.(MD)No.240 of 2021
09.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!