Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2858 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
C.M.P(MD)No.6831 of 2020
in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.50487 of 2020
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Through its
The Managing Director,
Tirunelveli,
Madurai Division.
... Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
1. Irulandi
2. Raja ....Respondents/Respondents
Prayer in C.M.P(MD).No.6831 of 2020: This petition is filed under
Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicle Act, to condone the delay of 1665 days
in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order dated
28.04.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.89 of 2012 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Sankarankovil.
Prayer in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.50487 of 2020: This Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,
pleased to allow this appeal, set aside the award and decree made in
MCOP.No.89 of 2012 dated 01.04.2015 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Court, Sankarankovil.
http://www.judis.nic.in
1/6
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Prabhakaran
For Respondents : Mr.R.J.Karthick
ORDER
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the
delay of 1665 days in preferring the above appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
Tribunal passed the award on 01.04.2015 and after receiving a certified
copy of the order from the lower Court on 26.05.2015, the petitioner
obtained legal opinion from the Transport counsel on the first week of
June 2015. Thereafter, the case bundle was mingled with other case
bundles and also due to pandemic of corona, there occurred a delay of
1665 days in filing the above appeal. Hence, the delay is neither wilful
nor wanton and would pray to condone the delay of 1665 days in filing
the above appeal.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the
respondents and also perused the materials available on record.
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
4. In State of Bihar vs. Deo Kumar Singh (SLP (Civil) No.
13348/2019 dated 05.05.2019, the appeal was filed with the delay of 728
days stating that the delay occurred in obtaining all the sanctions from
the respective departments and also in receiving the affidavit and
vakalathnama from the concerned department. The Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the said case, has held that a clear signal has to sent to the
Government Authorities that they cannot approach the Court as an when
they please on account of gross incompetence of their officers and that
too without taking any action against the concerned officers. Ultimately,
in the said case, the Apex Court while declining to condone the delay of
728 days in filing the appeal, imposed the cost of Rs.20,000/- to be
recovered from the officers responsible for that delay and be deposited to
the Mediation Centre of the Supreme Court within four weeks.
5. In the present case also, the delay is stated to have been
occurred for want of legal opinion from the Transport counsel and
thereafter, the case bundle was mingled with other bundles and hence,
the petitioner could not able to file the appeal in time. It is also stated
that due to situation created on account of Corona pandemic, the appeal
papers were handed over to the present learned counsel on the record
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
only during the fourth week of November 2020. In view of the above
judgment of the Apex Court, such kind of reasons cannot be termed as
sufficient reasons to condone the delay. Therefore, this Court is not
inclined to condone such a huge delay of 1665 days in filing the appeal.
6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. In view of the order
passed in CMP(MD)No.6831 of 2020, the connected C.M.A.
(MD)SR.No.50487 of 2020 is rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs.
08.02.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pkn
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
To
1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Court, Sankarankovil.
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.(MD).No.6831 of 2020
J.NISHA BANU,J
pkn
C.M.P(MD)No.6831 of 2020 in C.M.A(MD).SR.No.50487 of 2020
08.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!