Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2794 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021
A.S.No.764 of 2002
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A.S.No.764 of 2002
The Special Tahsildar,
(Land Acquisition),
South Neighbourhood Scheme,
Unit III, Madurai. ...Appellant/Referring Officer
Vs.
1.Bashruddin ..Respondent/Claimant
2.The Executive Engineer and
Administrative Officer,
Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
Madurai. ...Respondent/Beneficiary
PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition
Act, against the judgment and decree of the learned I Additional
Subordinate Court, Madurai in L.A.O.P.No.109 of 1995 dated 27.02.1998.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah
Additional Government Pleader
For R1 : Mr.C.Sundaravadivel
For R2 : Mr.R.Janarthanan
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved over the order of the Land Acquisition Tribunal
enhancing the compensation from Rs.122.22/- per cent to Rs.1,500/- per
cent, the present appeal suit came to be filed.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.No.764 of 2002
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein,
as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3.The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Appeal Suit, are as
follows:-
(i) An extent of 0.64.0 hectares in Survey No.67/6, Uchampatti
Village, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai was acquired under a notification
issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 25.04.1991, for the
purpose of constructing houses for the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. The
Land Acquisition Officer fixed the compensation at the rate of Rs.122.22/-
per cent. Thereafter, the matter has been referred to the Tribunal under
Section 18(1) of the Act as the claimants have claimed Rs.1,500/- per sq.ft.
as compensation.
(ii) Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimant, C.W.1 was
examined and Exs.C1 to C4 were marked and on the side of the respondent
R.W.1 was examined and Ex.R1 was marked.
(ii) The Land Acquisition Tribunal after considering the evidences
and materials placed before it, has enhanced the compensation from
Rs.122.22/- per cent to Rs.1,500/- per cent with 30% solatium with
necessary interest. Challenging same, the present appeal is filed.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.No.764 of 2002
4. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for
the appellant.
5. In the light of the above, now the point arises for consideration
in this appeal is:
(i) Whether the compensation enhanced by the
Land Acquisition Tribunal is unreasonable and without any
basis?
6. On perusal of the entire materials, it reveals that the Tribunal
has also considered the location of the property and nature of the
development took place in the nearby properties and enhanced the
compensation to Rs.1,500/- per cent and Ex.C3 in fact shows that the land
has been sold for higher value in the year 1988 itself. Therefore, this Court
is of the view that the order of the Tribunal is well reasonable and based on
the factual aspects. Accordingly, this Court does not find any infirmity or
error in the order. Accordingly, the point for consideration is answered.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.No.764 of 2002
7. In the result, the present Appeal Suit is dismissed confirming the
judgment and decree of the I Additional Sub Court, Madurai in L.A.O.P.No.
109 of 1995 dated 27.02.1998. No costs.
05.02.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
ta
To
1.The I Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.No.764 of 2002
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
ta
Judgment made in A.S.No.764 of 2002
05.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!