Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Kalaivani vs The Superintending Engineer
2021 Latest Caselaw 2773 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2773 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Madras High Court
A.Kalaivani vs The Superintending Engineer on 5 February, 2021
                                                                                 W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 05.02.2021

                                                         CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR

                                                W.P. No. 4212 of 2011
                     1.A.Kalaivani
                     2. A.Ragupathy                                              ... Petitioners
                                                            -vs-

                     1. The Superintending Engineer,
                        T.N.E.B.., Villupuram Electricity Distribution Circle,
                        Villupuram.

                     2. The Chief Engineer,
                        Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                        No.144, Anna Salai,
                        Chennai - 600 002.                                       ... Respondents
                     PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
                     India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the
                     respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 19.11.2008
                     seeking compassionate ground appointment insofar as the second
                     petitioner is concerned on merits.


                                       For Petitioners     :   Mr.L.Chandrakumar

                                       For Respondents     :   Mr.M.Fakkir Mohideen
                                                               Standing counsel for TNEB



                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

                                                        ORDER

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing

the respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 19.11.2008

seeking compassionate ground appointment insofar as the second

petitioner is concerned on merits.

2. The first petitioner's husband and the second petitioner's father

was the employee of the respondents / TANGEDGO and while he was in

service, he suddenly died due to the accident on 15.02.2000. At the time

of the death of the employee, the second petitioner, i.e., son, was minor,

therefore, the first petitioner / wife made an application on 28.09.2000 to

the respondents seeking compassionate appointment. Therefore, that was

the application filed within a period of three years from the death of the

employee.

3. In view of the said fact, admittedly, since the second petitioner,

who is the son of the deceased employee, was only minor and he attained

majority only on 18.06.2007, after he became major in 2007, it seems

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

that, he reiterated the said application by making representation in the

year 2007-2008. However, since none of them yielded the result as

desired, the petitioner chosen to file this Writ Petition with the aforesaid

prayer.

4. Heard Mr.L.Chandrakumar, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, who has given the aforesaid factual details and seeks

indulgence of this Court.

5. Mr.M.Fakkir Mohideen, learned Standing counsel appearing for

the respondents would submit that, in view of the rule position which has

been clearly given in various board proceedings by taking into

consideration in proper perspective the orders of this Court in number of

cases and also the Full Bench Judgment as well as the Division Bench

Judgment of this Court, the three years rule shall be strictly followed. In

this case, beyond the three years rule, the second petitioner has

admittedly become major only in the year 2007 i.e., after seven years of

the death of the employee, therefore, the question of extending the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

benefit of compassionate appointment to the family of the deceased

employee does not arise. In this case, since it goes against the three years

rule, the plea cannot be considered and accepted.

6. The said submissions made by both sides are taken into account

and I have perused the materials placed before this Court.

7. In view of the categorical pronouncement made in W.P.(MD)

No. 7016 of 2011 etc., batch dated 07.12.2020 followed by the Division

Bench order in Inspector General of Prisons, v. Marimuthu reported

2016 (5) CTC 125, the plea raised by the petitioner cannot be accepted and

therefore, this Court is not inclined to give any mandamus as sought for

in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

05.02.2021

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No vji

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

To

1. The Superintending Engineer, T.N.E.B.., Villupuram Electricity Distribution Circle, Villupuram.

2. The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

vji

W.P. No. 4212 of 2011

05.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter