Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Triniity Colour India (P) Limited vs The Inspector General Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2694 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2694 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Madras High Court
Triniity Colour India (P) Limited vs The Inspector General Of ... on 5 February, 2021
                                                                           W.P.No.27199 of 2017

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Dated     : 05.02.2021

                                                     CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

                                              W.P.No.27199 of 2017
                                                       and
                                              W.M.P.No.29069 of 2017

                     Triniity Colour India (P) Limited,
                     Represented by its Director,
                     Mr.A.Yogeshkumar,
                     S/o.C.Ayyakkan,
                     No.27, Annamalai Nagar,
                     Off: Mettur Road,
                     Erode-638 011.                                        ... Petitioner

                                                                 Vs.

                     1.The Inspector General of Registrations,
                       Mylapore,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Sub-Registrar,
                       Annur,
                       Coimbatore District.                                ... Respondents

                     Prayer: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2
                     to refund the 2% additional stamp duty collected from the petitioner
                     Company for registering the Sale Certificate presented by the petitioner
                     Company as Doc.No.7230/2016 dated 17.11.2016.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/7
                                                                               W.P.No.27199 of 2017

                                        For Petitioner    : Mr.E.J.Ayyappan

                                        For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman
                                                          Government Advocate


                                                           ORDER

The writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents 1

and 2 to refund the 2% additional stamp duty collected from the

petitioner Company for registering the Sale Certificate presented by the

petitioner Company as Doc.No.7230/2016 dated 17.11.2016.

2.The brief facts are necessary for disposal of the writ petition are

as follows:-

Petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act. The

petitioner participated in the public auction conducted by the Authorised

Officer of the State Bank of India. The property which was brought to

public auction by the State Bank of India was purchased by the petitioner

company. The authorized officer follwing auction issued a sale certificate

dated 11.11.2016 in favour of the petitioner company under the

SARFAESI Act. Later the sales certificate was presented for

registeration. The second respondent instructed and directed the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

petitioner to pay a stamp duty of 7% ( 5% stamp Duty + 2% Surcharge)

on the value of the sales certificate as per instructions. It is stated by the

petitioner that he paid 2% Surcharge under protest for completing the

registration process. Hence the petitioner approached the second

respondent for refund of excess 2% charged as Surcharge on the value of

the sale certificate. Since, there was no response, the petitioner has filed

the above writ petition.

3.The learnced counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment

of the learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.28343 of 2015 in the

case of P.Pandian Vs.The Inspector General of Registeration and

another

4.The respondent submitted that the petitioner is liable to pay the

stamp duty as required under Article 18 (c) r/w 23 of Indian Stamp Act.

He referred to the judgement of Full Bench of this Court in the case of

Dr.R.Thiagarajan Vs.The Inspector General of Registeration, Chennai

and others reported in 2019 (4) CTC 839 in the counter affidavit. From

the portion of judgment entered in the counter affidavit, it is seen that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

case does not relate to the levy of surcharge under District Municipalities

Act.

5.The question arise for consideration in this writ petition is

whether the petitioner is liable to pay 2% of Surcharge apart from 5% of

Stamp duty before registering the sale certificate issued by the authorized

officier. First of all it is to be noted that 2% surcharge collected from the

petitioner is not under the provisons of Stamp Act. It is specifically stated

that 2% Surcharge was collected from the petitioner as contemplated

under Section 116 (A) of Tamil Nadu District Municipality Act 1920.

6.This Court, in the case of P.Pandian Vs.The Inspector General

of Registeration and another in W.P.No.28343 of 2015 held that

transactions which would attract surcharge under Section 116 (A) of

Tamil Nadu District Municipality Act 1920, does not include the sale

certificate issued by the bank. The sale certificate is not a Sale of

immovable property or Exchange or Gift of immovable property or

mortgage with possession of immovable property or lease in perpetuity

of immovable property as dealt with under Section 116A Tamil Nadu

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

District Municipalities Act, 1920. It is also held that a Sale Certificate is

a document issued by the duly authorized statutory authority evidencing

the factum of a statutory sale.

7.This Court is of the view that the judgment of Full Bench is not

applicable in this case. The petitioner there in paid stamp duty as per the

market value. It was contented by the petitioner that the petitioner who is

the purchaser of the property in proceedings under SARFAESI Act,

should get the sale certificate by paying stamp duty only for the sale

consideration stated out in the sale certificate and that there is no scope

for reference under section 47 (A) of the Indian Stamp Act which is not

applicable in respect of sale by way of public auction under SARFAESI

Act. The Hon'ble Full Bench did not agree with this proposition and held

that the Section 47A of Stamp Act can be invoked.

8.In the present case, the issue is not relating to under valuation. It

is not a case of petitioner or the respondent that the value mentioned in

the sale certificate is grosly inadequate.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

9.The Judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court is

applicable to this case and the full bench judgement has no relevance.

The Respondents are liable to refund the 2% additional surcharge

collected from the petitioner Company for registering the Sale Certificate

presented by the petitioner Company as Doc.No.7230/2016 dated

17.11.2016.

Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. No Costs. Consequently,

the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.02.2021

Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No tta

Copy to

1.The Inspector General of Registrations, Mylapore, Chennai.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Annur, Coimbatore District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

S.S.SUNDAR.,J

tta

W.P.No.27199 of 2017

05.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter