Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2582 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2021
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :04.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI
C.M.A(MD)No.404 of 2017
and
CMP(MD)No.4381 of 2017
The Managing Director,
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Nagercoil, Agastheswaram Taluk,
Kanyakumari District. : Appellant/2nd Respondent
Vs.
1.Ramayyan Asari
2.Pasubathi
3.Ajitha
4.Sajitha : R1 to R4/Petitioners
5.Justin Raj
(R5 is the driver of the appellant and
that given up)
6.The Branch Manager,
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited,
Office at D.D.J Centre, 1st Floor,
Opp. To Vadasery Bus Stand,
Nagercoil, Agastheeswaram Taluk,
Kanyakumari District. : R5 and R6/Respondents 1 & 3
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under
Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the award, dated
04.08.2011 made in MCOP No.23 of 2007 on the file of Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Padmanabhapuram.
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
For Appellant : Mr.P.Prabhakaran
For R1 to R4 : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji
For 5th Respondent : Given up
For 6th Respondent : Mr.K.Bhaskaran
JUDGMENT
(Thro' VC)
Challenge made in this appeal is to the award passed by the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Padmanabhapuram,
in MCOP No.23 of 2007, dated 04.08.2011.
2.The brief facts of the case are that on 31.12.2006 at 2.40
pm, the deceased Ratheesh Kumar @ Reji was riding the motor
cycle TN-74-V-1608 from Kavasthalam Junction to Mamoodu
Junction and while he was nearing opposite of Helen Technical
Institute at Kavasthalam, the TNTSC Bus TN-74-N-0673 came in a
rash and negligent manner in the opposite direction and hit against
the two wheeler. Due to it, the rider of the motor cycle thrown out
and back wheel tyre of the bus run over his head and died on the
spot. The claimants, being the legal heirs of the deceased filed a
claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- on the
ground that the driver of the Bus was responsible for the accident.
http://www.judis.nic.in
3.The claimants have stated that at the time of the accident,
the age of the deceased was 25 and he was working as 'Carpenter'
and was earning Rs.5,000/- per month. A criminal case in Crime
No.330 of 2006 was registered against the driver of the Bus by
Kulasekharam Police.
4.The claim was opposed by the appellant Transport
Corporation disputing the manner of accident and their liability to
pay compensation.
5.The Tribunal, upon consideration of oral and documentary
evidence, came to the conclusion that the driver of the Bus was
responsible for the accident and awarded compensation of Rs.
4,58,500/- with interest @ 7.5 % p.a. Aggrieved by the award of the
tribunal, the appellant Insurance Company is before this court.
6.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on
record.
7.It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that
the tribunal without appreciating the law and facts and evidence
http://www.judis.nic.in
had wrongly fixed the entire responsibility on the part of the driver
of the Transport Corporation Bus and the multiplier adopted by the
tribunal is wrong and further, the quantum of award is on the
higher side, so the quantum is to be reduced. On the other hand,
the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4/claimants submitted
that the award is reasonable, which does not warrant any
interference of this court.
.
8.In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the deceased
was working as 'Carpenter'. Since no reliable document has been
produced to prove the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.
5,000/-, considering the facts and circumstance of the case and
after deduction of personal expenses, the tribunal fixed the monthly
income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/- per month and by applying
proper multiplier '11', awarded Rs.3,96,000/- towards loss of
income. Further, the Tribunal awarded Rs.40,000/- towards loss of
love and affection to the claimants 1 to 4; Rs.5,000/- towards
funeral expenses; Rs.7,500/- for transportation and Ambulance
expenses, Rs.5,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.5,000/- towards
damages to clothes. In total, the Tribunal has awarded Rs.
4,58,500/- together with interest @ 7.5% p.a. This court is of the
http://www.judis.nic.in
considered opinion that the award of the tribunal, based on the
evidence is reasonable and warrants no interference of this court
and the same is confirmed.
9.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed,
confirming the award of the tribunal. No costs. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
04.02.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No er
To
1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Record Keeper, V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in
T.KRISHNAVALLI.J.,
er
C.M.A(MD)No.404 of 2017
04.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!