Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2470 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021
C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
Govindaraj ... Appellant
-vs-
1.K.Ramakrishnan
2.P.Saaratham
3.The Manager
National Insurance Co.
Pudukkottai ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 04.02.2000
in M.C.O.P.No.202 of 1998, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(Sub Court), Kumbakonam.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Sivathilakar
For Respondents : No appearance for R1
R2 – Dismissed
vide Court Order dated 26.06.2019
Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan for R3
Page 1 of 4
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
JUDGMENT
Heard Mr.S.Sivathilakar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant
and Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan, learned counsel appearing for the third
respondent – Insurance Company and perused the materials available on
record.
2. This is a case of injury. The appellant sought compensation of
Rs.5,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in an accident occurred on
24.02.1997. The Tribunal, having found that the offending vehicle was not
insured on the date of the accident, exonerated the third respondent –
Insurance Company from paying the award amount and passed the Award as
against the owner of the vehicle for a sum of Rs.54,500/-. Seeking
enhancement of the compensation, the injured claimant has come up with
this appeal.
3. It is seen that as against the owner of the offending vehicle /
second respondent, the appeal came to be dismissed on 26.06.2019.
Admittedly, on the date of the accident, the offending vehicle was not insured
with the third respondent – Insurance Company. Hence, the findings of the
Tribunal with regard to exonerating the Insurance Company from paying the
http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
award amount and making the second respondent liable to pay the award
amount, do not warrant any interference of this Court. The appellant, who
seeks compensation from the owner of the offending vehicle, failed to take
steps to serve notice on him. Therefore, this civil miscellaneous appeal is
dismissed for default. No costs.
03.02.2021
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Note :
In view of the present lock down
owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
web copy of the Judgment may be
utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the Judgment that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
krk
To:
1.The Sub Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kumbakonam.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
krk
C.M.A.(MD) No.959 of 2010
03.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!