Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Shanmugavel vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 2468 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2468 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021

Madras High Court
S.Shanmugavel vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 3 February, 2021
                                                               W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 03.02.2021

                                                   CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
                                             AND
                              THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                 W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021
                                                     and
                      C.M.P.(MD)Nos.552, 554, 563, 564, 568, 573, 574, 578 and 567 of 2021

                W.A.(MD)No.170 of 2021:-

                S.Shanmugavel                                                ... Appellant

                                                      Vs.
                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                  Rep. by its Secretary,
                  Higher Education (G2) Department,
                  Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

                2.The Director of Collegiate Education,
                  E.V.K. Sampath Maligai,
                  College Road, Chennai – 6.

                3.The Regional Joint Director,
                  Vaithiyanatha Iyer 1st Street,
                  Shenoy Nagar, Madurai – 20.                                ... Respondents

                Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order

                passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.14975 of 2014, dated 08.12.2020.

                             For Appellant             : Mr.E.V.N.Siva



http://www.judis.nic.in
                1/5
                                                                 W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021

                            For Respondents             : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss
                                                          Special Government Pleader

                                               *****
                                           COMMON JUDGMENT
                          (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

                            These Writ Appeals arise in a peculiar circumstance. Though writ

                petitions were filed by a number of employees similarly placed, there is a

                distinction among themselves being in service and retired. The learned Single

                Judge passed an order that the writ petitioners, those who have got retired,

                would be entitled to receive the pension along with other benefits without going

                through the rigour of recovery.



                            2.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that

                what has been challenged is an inter departmental communication. Therefore,

                the appellants were ill-advised to challenge the same without awaiting for the

                recovery orders against them, which is likely to be passed henceforth. In such

                view of the matter, permission may be granted to withdraw the writ petitions

                with liberty to challenge the recovery orders to be passed.



                            3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

                respondents submitted that recovery orders are yet to be passed and it is the

                appellants, who warranted the order.

http://www.judis.nic.in
                2/5
                                                                 W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021

                          4.Considering the above said submissions made, we are inclined to

                permit the appellants to withdraw the writ petitions. When the similarly placed

                persons who are in service, get the benefits, the retired persons also can get the

                same benefits.     Furthermore, recovery orders are yet to be passed. The

                impugned order is a departmental communication between two parties. We are

                also find that no cause of action as on today to challenge the impugned order.


                          5.In such view of the matter, we are inclined to permit the appellants

                to withdraw the writ petitions insofar as the challenge made by them is

                concerned.


                          6.In view of the above, these Writ Appeals are disposed of. The order

                passed by the learned Single, dated 08.12.2020, made in W.P.(MD)Nos.14975,

                15417, 16379, 15267, 14977, 14976, 15217 & 15504 of 2014 and 5376 of 2015

                is set aside, insofar the present appellants are concerned. W.P.(MD)Nos.14975,

                15417, 16379, 15267, 14977, 14976, 15217 & 15504 of 2014 and 5376 of 2015

                are dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is given to the appellants herein/writ

                petitioners to challenge the recovery orders to be passed in future. No costs.

                Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                Index    :Yes/No                            [M.M.S.J.,]      [S.A.I.J.,]
                Internet :Yes                                       03.02.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
                3/5
                                                                  W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021




                Note: In view of the present lock down owing to
                COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be
                utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy
                of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall
                be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.


                To

                1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu,
                  Higher Education (G2) Department,
                  Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

                2.The Director of Collegiate Education,
                  E.V.K. Sampath Maligai,
                  College Road, Chennai – 6.

                3.The Regional Joint Director,
                  Vaithiyanatha Iyer 1st Street,
                  Shenoy Nagar, Madurai – 20.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                4/5
                                    W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021

                                               M.M.SUNDRESH, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

smn2

Common Judgment in W.A.(MD)Nos.170 and 172 to 179 of 2021

03.02.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter