Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.S4 Carlisle Publishing ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax 6
2021 Latest Caselaw 2225 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2225 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.S4 Carlisle Publishing ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax 6 on 2 February, 2021
                                                                                     TCA.No.502 of 2020


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 02.02.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                      The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                          and
                                        The Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA

                                            Tax Case Appeal No.502 of 2020

                     M/s.S4 Carlisle Publishing Service P Ltd,
                     Prakash Towers, 1st Floor,
                     141, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR),
                     Kottivakkam, Chennai - 600 041.                               ...Appellant

                                                            Vs

                     Commissioner of Income Tax 6,
                     Chennai.                                                      ...Respondent


                             APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the
                     order dated 28.06.2018 made in ITA.No.368/Mds/2018 on the file of the
                     Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, for the assessment year
                     2008-09.


                                          For Appellant:         Mr.N.V.Balaji

                                          For Respondent:        Mr.J.Narayanasamy
                                                                 Senior Standing Counsel



                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                      TCA.No.502 of 2020


                                                       JUDGMENT

(Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)

This appeal, filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the

Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order

28.06.2018 made in ITA.No.368/Mds/2018 on the file of the Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, (for brevity, the Tribunal) for the

assessment year 2008-09.

2. The assessee has raised the following substantial questions of

law for consideration:

"1. Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in not holding that the addition made under Section 68 of the Act is not sustainable, particularly when the appellant had explained the credit to the share capital and share premium account with material evidences?

2. Is the order of the Tribunal in remitting the case back to assessing officer not perverse, particularly when all material evidences were before it?

3. Whether on facts and circumstances of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.502 of 2020

case, the Tribunal was right in remitting the case back to the records of the Assessing Officer with a direction to examine whether the valuation of shares done by the assessee is accordance with law or rule and proceed to determine the correct value of share and income, when the issue before the Tribunal was not on the value of shares but whether at all addition could be made under Section 68, when the credit is fully explained by the appellant?

4. Is the Tribunal right in remitting the case back to the assessing officer to examine on valuation of shares particularly when in the earlier year the appellant had issued shares to Indian promoters at price very close to the price at which shares were issued to the non-residence in the impugned year and all the records were before the Tribunal?"

3. We have heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the

appellant-assessee and Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing

Counsel appearing for the respondent-Revenue.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.502 of 2020

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that as on date,

the case of the assessee has been accepted by the Assessing Officer and

therefore, they are withdrawing the appeal. The learned counsel has also

sent an e-mail to that effect and the same is taken on record. The learned

counsel further submitted that in the event of any action initiated by the

Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act, the appellant's

right to contest should not be foreclosed.

5. The appellant-assessee need not have any such apprehension,

because as on date, the stand taken by the assessee has been accepted. If

anything has to be done at the higher level, it goes without saying that the

statutory remedy available to the assessee under the Act would be fully

available and cannot be foreclosed.

6. With the above liberty, the tax case appeal stands dismissed as

withdrawn. No costs.

                                                                          (T.S.S.,J.)    (R.N.M.,J.)
                                                                                 02.02.2021
                     hvk





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.502 of 2020

To

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.502 of 2020

T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J

hvk

TCA.No.502 of 2020

02.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter