Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Arjun Technologies Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 2220 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2220 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Arjun Technologies Ltd on 2 February, 2021
                                                                            TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 02.02.2021

                                                       CORAM :

                                      The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                          and
                                        The Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA

                                       Tax Case Appeal Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021
                                                          and
                                            C.M.P.Nos.1786 & 1787 of 2021

                     The Commissioner of Income Tax,
                     Chennai.                                  ...Appellant in all cases

                                                          Vs

                     M/s.Arjun Technologies Ltd.,
                     Park View, II Floor,
                     94(85), G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar,
                     Chennai - 600 017.
                     PAN: AAACA930C                            ...Respondent in all cases

COMMON PRAYER: Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 07.02.2017 made in ITA.No.1573/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2007-08, ITA.No.1382/Mds/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09 and ITA.No.1381/Mds/2013 for the assessment year 2006-07 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021

(in all cases) For Appellant: Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel

For Respondent: Mr.Md.Shaffiq

COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)

These appeals, filed by the Revenue, are directed against the order

dated 13.10.2017 made in ITA.No.1573/Mds/2014 for the assessment year

2007-08, ITA.No.1382/Mds/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09 and

ITA.No.1381/Mds/2013 for the assessment year 2006-07 on the file of the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai ('The Tribunal'

for brevity).

2. The appellant-Revenue in all these appeals has raised the

following substantial questions of law for consideration:

"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in remitting the issue back to the file of AO in respect of retention money withheld by the customer with a direction to include only such

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021

part of the retention money which was actually received by the Assessee during the relevant assessment year without appreciating the fact that the assessee has been following Mercantile system of accounting and the same has already accrued to the assessee and therefore liable to be taxed?

2. Whether the finding of the Tribunal is proper by directing the AO to include the actual sum that were received from the Customer on retention money on receipt basis instead of including the retention money withheld by the customer on accrual basis and the said direction of the Tribunal would amount to cash system as well as mercantile system method to be followed for a given assessment year which is not proper?"

3. We have heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing

Counsel for the appellant-Revenue and Mr.Mohamed Shaffiq, learned

counsel for the respondent.

4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the

appellant submits that the above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021

account of the low tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated

08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said

Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High

Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax

effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.

5. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeals

are dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial question of

law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold

limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to file a

petition before this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on

merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

closed.

                                                                             (T.S.S.,J.)    (R.N.M.,J.)
                                                                                    02.02.2021
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No

Speaking Judgment/Non speaking Judgment

hvk

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021

To

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021

T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J

hvk

T.C.A.Nos.103, 107 & 108 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.1786 & 1787 of 2021

02.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter