Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Shobha vs Rajeswari
2021 Latest Caselaw 2145 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2145 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Shobha vs Rajeswari on 1 February, 2021
                                                                                 Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 01.02.2021

                                                          CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                                   Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019


                     R.Shobha
                     W/o.Ramesh                                            ... Petitioner


                                                             Vs.

                     Rajeswari
                     W/o.Unnikrishnan                                      ... Respondent




                     Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. Section 401 of the

                     Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the conviction imposed in the judgment

                     dated 04.10.2018 made in C.A.No.33 of 2017 on the file of the learned Fourth

                     Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore which confirmed the

                     conviction and modified the sentence imposed in the judgment dated

                     18.01.2017 made in C.C.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial

                     Magistrate/ Fast Track Court No.2 (Magistrate Level), Coimbatore (Transferred

                     C.C.No.228 of 2015, Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore) by allowing this

                     Criminal Revision Petition.

                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019


                                           For Petitioner   : Mr.N.Manokaran
                                           For Respondent : Mr.J.Saravanan


                                                            ORDER

This criminal Revision has been filed to set aside the judgment dated

04.10.2018 made in C.A.No.33 of 2017 on the file of the learned Fourth

Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore which confirmed the

conviction and the sentence imposed in the judgment dated 18.01.2017 made

in C.C.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate/ Fast Track

Court No.2 (Magistrate Level), Coimbatore (Transferred C.C.No.228 of 2015,

Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore) by allowing this Criminal Revision

Petition.

2. The petitioner herein was the appellant in C.A.No.33 of 2017 on the

file of the Additional Sessions Court. The petitioner is the accused in

C.C.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate/ Fast Track

Court – II (Magistrate Level). After enquiry the Magistrate found guilty of the

petitioner and convicted and sentenced to undergo one year simple

imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019

3. Against which the petitioner had filed an appeal before the learned

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore and the same was taken on

file in C.A.No.33 of 2017 and made over to the learned IV Additional District

and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. After hearing the appeal, the learned IV

Additional District and Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal. Against the

dismissal of the appeal in C.A.No.33 of 2017, the petitioner/ accused has filed

the present Revision before this court.

4. During the pendency of this Revision, the parties have settled the

matter and they have also filed a joint memo of compromise. As per the

guidelines of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Damodar S Prabhu Vs

Sayed Babalal H reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, if the case is settled before

the High Court, the petitioner has to pay 15% of cheque amount by way of

cost. When the matter came up on 19.01.2021, both the parties have filed a

joint memo of compromise and this court had directed to pay the cost of 15%

of the cheque amount as per the guidelines given in the decision cited supra.

5. Today, when the matter is listed, the counsel for the petitioner has

submitted the memo stating that the petitioner has paid 15% of the cheque

amount as cost. The same is recorded and the Revision is allowed. The order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019

of conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner is set aside. The joint

memo of compromise filed by both the parties shall form part and parcel of

the order.




                                                                                        01.02.2021

                     Index         : Yes/No
                     Internet      : Yes/No
                     Speaking Order/ Non-speaking order
                     dsa







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                     Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019

                                     P.VELMURUGAN.J.,


                                                      dsa




                                   Crl.R.C.No.12 of 2019




                                             01.02.2021







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter