Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Moorthy vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 25394 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 25394 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 December, 2021

Madras High Court
Moorthy vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ... on 29 December, 2021
                                                                                 Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 29.12.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                           Criminal Appeal No.681 of 2021

                  Moorthy                                                    ... Appellant

                                                       Versus

                  1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                    Villianur Circle,
                    Pondicherry.

                  2.State Rep.by
                    The Station House Officer,
                    Mangalam Police Station,
                    Pondicherry,
                    Crime No.187 of 2020.

                  3.The Chairperson,
                    Child Welfare Committee,
                    Ariyankuppam,
                    Puducherry.                                             ... Respondents

                             Criminal Appeal filed under Sections 374(2) of Criminal Procedure
                  Code, to call for the records and set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.2573 of
                  2021 dated 22.11.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, Pondicherry and
                  to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.187 of 2020 on the file of the
                  respondent police.


                  Page 1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

                                  For Appellant     :     Mr.M.Karthik
                                  For Respondents :       Mr.V.Balamurugane
                                                          Public Prosecutor
                                                          Pondicherry

                                                  JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22.11.2021

in Crl.M.P.No.2573 of 2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, Pondicherry

and to enlarge the appellant on bail in Crime No.187 of 2020 on the file of the

respondent/police.

2.The appellant, who was arrayed as A8 along with other accused were

arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.11.2020 for the offences

under Sections 6 and 10 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

(Amendment) Act 2019; Section 17 of The Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act 2012; Section 3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and the

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015; Section

3(2)(V) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Amendment Act 1989; Section 14(1) of Child Labour (Prohibition and

Regulation) Act, 1986; Sections 372, 373, 374, 376 A B of IPC along with

Sections 75, 77 and 81 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

Children) Act, 2015 and Section 376(3), 341, 342 of IPC r/w Section 34 of

IPC and to delete the Sections of Law 3(1)(i)(iv) (xii) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in Crime

No.187 of 2020 on the file of the 2nd respondent/police herein. Hence, the

appellant and other accused/A5 filed a petition under Section 439 (1) Cr.P.C

before the learned Special Judge, Puducherry seeking bail. After hearing the

arguments, the lower Court, dismissed the petition. Hence, the appellant has

come forward with the present Criminal Appeal seeking bail.

3.The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the trial Court

dismissed the petition only on the ground that while deposing evidence, the

victim children under fear reported that if the accused are released on bail,

they will do anything. He further submitted that the appellant is in custody for

more than 396 days and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and

if the appellant is granted bail he is ready to abide by any conditions imposed

on him and thereby, he prays to grant bail to the appellant. He further

submitted that he has not impleaded the victims as party in the present Appeal

and hence, he seeks permission of this Court to implead the victims.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, Pondicherry appearing for the

respondents submitted that the offences committed by the appellant are

serious in nature and the investigation is pending and also the charge sheet is

yet to be filed. Hence, he vehemently objected to grant bail to the appellant.

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials

available on record.

6.On a perusal of the records and the submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant is

involved in the offence punishable under Sections 6 and 10 of The

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2019; Section

17 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012; Section

3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015; Section 3(2)(V) of Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 1989; Section

14(1) of Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986; Sections 372,

373, 374, 376 A B of IPC along with Sections 75, 77 and 81 of the Juvenile

Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Section 376(3), 341,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

342 of IPC r/w Section 34 of IPC and to delete the Sections of Law 3(1)(i)(iv)

(xii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act, 1989 are serious in nature and investigation is pending and charge sheet

has not yet been filed. During the investigation, if the appellant is released on

bail, there is a possibility of tampering the witnesses and destroy the material

evidence.

7.In the light of the above facts and considering the serious nature of

the offences, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the appellant.

Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed.

29.12.2021 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order ms

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

To

1.The Special Judge, Pondicherry.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Kalapattu.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Pondicherry.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Villianur Circle, Pondicherry.

5.The Station House Officer, Mangalam Police Station, Pondicherry.

6.The Chairperson, Child Welfare Committee, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

ms

Crl.A.No.681 of 2021

29.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter