Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24740 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.19972 of 2021
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.11270 & 11271 of 2021
1.Rawuther Gani
2.Jemila @ Jemilabegum
3.Raja Mohamed
4.Sheik Mohamed
5.Mathina Rani
6.Sharmila Banu @ Sharmila @ Rasathi
7.Shabura
8.Beebe Jon
9.Dhawlath @ Dhawlath Beevi
10.Rahamath Nisha ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.1to9 & 11
Vs
1.The State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2021
Fort All Women Police Station,
Tiruchirapalli District.
(Crime No.19/2019)
2.Absabegum ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal
Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.992 of 2021
on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court,
Tiruchirappalli and quash the same insofar as these petitioners are
concerned.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran
For R1 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for R1.
2. The petitioners are facing trial in C.C.No.992 of 2021
on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court,
Tiruchirappalli.for the offences under Sections 498(A), 406, 506(i)
of IPC and Sections 9 & 10 of Child Marriage Act. To quash the
same, this Criminal Original Petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated all the
contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2021
4. I am not persuaded by the same. As rightly pointed out
by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, consideration of the
said contentions would necessarily involve undertaking a factual
probe. In exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., I
cannot do so. Leaving open the petitioner's contentions and
defences, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
5.However, taking note of the overall facts and
circumstances, the personal appearance of the petitioners before the
court below is dispensed with. The learned trial Magistrate shall
insist on the personal appearance of the petitioners only when it is
absolutely necessary and imperative. The petitioners shall be called
upon to appear in person before the trial Court at the time of
answering the charges and at the time of examination under Section
313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of pronouncement of Judgment. On
all other occasions, the petitioners can be represented through their
counsel. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
15.12.2021
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No rmi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2021
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
Note:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Fort All Women Police Station, Tiruchirapalli District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.19972 of 2021
15.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!