Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohandoss vs Chandrashekar Jalihal
2021 Latest Caselaw 24352 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24352 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2021

Madras High Court
Mohandoss vs Chandrashekar Jalihal on 10 December, 2021
                                                                     C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 10.12.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                           C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021
                                                       and
                                              C.M.P.No.5553 of 2021

                 C.M.A.No.55 of 2021

                 Mohandoss                                                         ... Appellant

                                                          Vs.
                 1.Chandrashekar Jalihal

                 2.M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.,
                   No.15A, P.L.A. Kanagu Towers,
                   11st Cross, Thillai Nagar,
                   Trichy – 18.
                                                                                 ... Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.02.2020 made in MCOP No.239 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Perambalur.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021




                                  For Appellant   :      Mr.T.Gobinath
                                  For Respondents :      Ms.C.Bhuvanasundari (for R2)



                 C.M.A.No.55 of 2021

                 The Branch Manager
                 Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd.,
                 15A, PLA Kanagu Towers,
                 11th Cross, Thillai Nagar,
                 Trichy – 18.                                                     ... Appellant

                                                          Vs.

                 1.Mohandoss
                 2.Chandrashehar Jalihal
                                                                                      ... Respondents


PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.02.2020 made in MCOP No.239 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Perambalur.

                                  For Appellant   :      Ms.C.Bhuvanasundari
                                  For Respondents :      Mr.T.Gobinath (for R1)






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021




                                                 COMMON JUDGMENT

[Common Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

Challenge in C.M.A.No.1027 of 2021 filed by the Insurance Company is to

the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge,

Perambalur in MCOP No.239 of 2016. Dissatisfied with the quantum, the claimant

has come up with the another appeal CMA No.55 of 2021 for enhancement of

compensation.

2.This is the case of injury. The case of the claimant is that on 25.10.2015 at

09.00 p.m, he was riding his Royal Enfield two wheeler on Trichy – Chennai NH

Road near Y Road Junction, Thiruvanaikovil from south towards north at the left

extreme side. At that time, a Hyundai car bearing Reg.No.KA-01-MK-5456

belonging to the first respondent in the claim petition insured with the appellant

insurance company, came from the same direction driven by its driver in a rash and

negligent manner and dashed against the claimant's vehicle. In the impact, the

claimant sustained multiple injuries all over the body. Alleging that the accident had

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021

taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Hyundai car,

the claimant laid a petition, claiming compensation of Rs.75,00,000/-.

3.Resisting the claim, the Insurance Company filed their counter disputing

the nature of injuries, period of treatment, medical expenses and alleged disability

and its liability to pay the compensation. It was also contended that the claim is

excessive and exorbitant.

4.To substantiate the case, on the side of the claimant, P.Ws.1 to 3 were

examined and Exs.P1 to Ex.P.21, Ex.C1 and Ex.X1 to Ex.X7 were marked. On the

side of the Insurance Company, no witness was examined and no document was

marked.

5.The Tribunal, after considering the oral and documentary evidence, held

that the driver of the Car was responsible for the accident and awarded

compensation of Rs.24,26,600/- to the claimant under the following heads:-






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021


                                                  Heads                      Rs.
                              Loss of earning capacity                      20,28,000/-
                              20000x12x13x65/100
                              Extra Nourishment                                10,000/-
                              Pain and Suffering                               50,000/-
                              Medical Expenses (Exs.P.8 and P.9)             1,27,800/-
                              Purchase and fitment of TT Prosthesis           2,00,800/-
                              Loss of Amenities                                10,000/-
                              Total                                         24,26,600/-


6.Challenging the said award, while CMA.No.55 of 2021 has been filed by

the claimant on the ground that the award amount is meager, CMA No.1027 of

2021 has been filed by the Insurance Company on the ground that the award

amount is on the higher side.

7.These appeals have been filed only challenging the quantum, hence, the

other issues need not be dealt with herein.

8.The learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has contended

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021

that the award is on the higher side and it requires reduction and the learned

counsel appearing for the claimant would submit that the award is very meager and

it has to be enhanced.

9.A perusal of the records would show that the Tribunal, considering the

evidence of P.W.2 and P.W.3 and considering the age of the claimant and date of

accident, has fixed the monthly income and adopting correct multiplier by following

the decision in Sarala Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and

another reported in 2009 TN MAC 1, awarded a just and reasonable

compensation. Further, the quantum of compensation under remaining heads fixed

by the Tribunal are reasonable. We find no reason to interfere with the conclusion

reached by the Tribunal. Both the appeals have not merit.

10.For the foregoing reasons, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeal fail and the

same are dismissed. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the entire award

amount with accrued interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021

such deposit, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the award amount less the

amount already withdrawn, if any, together with proportionate interest and costs.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                               [M.K.K.S.,J.]         [V.S.G.,J.]
                                                                          10.12.2021
                 skn
                 Intex            : Yes/No
                 Internet         : Yes/No




                 To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Perambalur.

2.V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021

skn

COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A.Nos.55 and 1027 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.5553 of 2021

10.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter