Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23953 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009, dated 6.12.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Erode
...Appellant in all
Cases
-vs-
S.K.M. Animal Feeds & Food (I) Ltd.,
156, Gandhiji Road, Erode 638 001 ...Respondent in all Cases
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the common order dated 12.10.2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, in I.T.A.Nos.1406,1493,1860 and 1955 /Mds/04.
For Appellant : Mr.M. Swaminathan
Sr. Standing Counsel for
Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani
Jr. Standing counsel (in all cases)
For Respondent : M/s.Sree Lakshmi Valli for
Mr. N. Muthukumar (in all cases)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009, dated 6.12.2021
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / Revenue, calling
in question the correctness of the order dated 12.10.2007 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.Nos.1406,1493,1860 and
1955/Mds/04, relating to the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02.
2. On 14.07.2009, these appeals were admitted by this Court on the
following substantial question of law:-
' Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the
Tribunal was right in deleting the disallowance of Rs.48,32,324/-
claimed by the assessee under section 801?'
3. When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009, dated 6.12.2021
these appeals is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be
less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open
the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q,
J.]
06.12.2021
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
msr
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench,
Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Erode.
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009, dated 6.12.2021
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
Tax Case Appeal Nos.548 to 551 of 2009
06.12.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!