Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tmt.Latha vs Smt.K.A.Letha
2021 Latest Caselaw 23653 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23653 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Madras High Court
Tmt.Latha vs Smt.K.A.Letha on 2 December, 2021
                                                                             CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       Dated : 02.12.2021.

                                                               CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

                                                    Crl.RC.No.339 of 2020
                                           and Crl.M.P.Nos.11805 and 12750 of 2021

                     Tmt.Latha                                                            ... Petitioner
                                                                 vs.
                     Smt.K.A.Letha                                                       ... Respondent

                     Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 & 401 of
                     the Code of Criminal Procedure, pleased to call for the records in Criminal
                     Appeal No.20 of 2019 on the file of the III Additional District & Sessions
                     Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamallee dated 21.01.2020 and confirm the order
                     dated 18.12.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate-II, Fast Track Court,
                     Poonamallee in S.T.C.No.86 of 2016.
                                              For Petitioner       : Mr.M.Kempraj
                                              For Respondent       : Mr.D.J.Venkatesan

                                                               ORDER

The Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to call for the records

in Crl.A.No.20 of 2019 passed by the learned III Additional and Sessions

Judge, Thiruvallur, Poonamalle dated 21.01.2020 reversing the order dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

18.12.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate II, Fast Track Court,

Poonamalle in S.T.C.No.86 of 2016.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their

rank before the Trial Court

3. The respondent/complainant had filed S.T.C.No.86 of 2016 before

the Judicial Magistrate II, Fast Track Court, Poonamallee against the

petitioner/accused for the offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments

Act, in respect of return of cheque bearing No.029502 dated 10.10.2015

drawn on ICICI Bank, Kamaraja Nagar, Avadi branch for a sum of

Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs and seventy thousand only).

4. On the side of the complainant, she examined herself as PW1 and

marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P6 and on the side of the accused, no witness has been

examined and no documents were marked.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

5. The Trial Court had found the accused not guilty for the offence

under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and had acquitted her by

an order dated 18.12.2018. As against the said order of acquittal the

complainant had filed Crl.A.No.20 of 2019 before the learned Additional

District & Sessions Judge, Poonamallee and the Appellate Court by an order

dated 21.01.2020 had allowed the appeal and set aside the order of acquittal

and had found the accused guilt for the offence under Section 138 of

Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her to undergo six months simple

imprisonment and also directed to pay Rs.5,40,000/- (twice the cheque

amount) towards compensation within two months in default to undergo

further period of two months simple imprisonment.

6. Against the order of conviction, the petitioner ought to have filed

criminal appeal, but she had wrongly preferred criminal revision and this

Court had also granted suspension of sentence by an order dated 27.02.2020

with a condition to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One lakh only)

before the Trial Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of the order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

7. The accused on account of being affected by Covid was unable to

deposit the amount within the time frame fixed by this Court and thereby

she had filed an application in Crl.M.P.No.11805 of 2021 for extension of

time. While the application was pending, the parties have compromised the

matter between themselves and they have filed Crl.M.P.No.12750 of 2021

seeking to compound the offence, in support of the compounding

application, the parties have filed the memo signed by both the parties and

their respective counsel.

8. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused would

submit that the parties have compromised the matter between themselves

and towards the total cheque amount of Rs.2,70,000/-, the

petitioner/accused had agreed to pay Rs.3,25,000/- and the complainant has

also accepted the same. An amount of Rs.3,10,000/- has been paid by way

of three demand drafts and balance amount of Rs.15,000/- has been paid by

way of cash.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

9. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent/complainant

also submitted that the respondent/complainant has accepted the amount and

agreed to compound the offence.

10. Both the complainant as well as the accused are present before

this Court. This Court enquired them, they also submitted that the

complainant has received an amount of Rs.3,25,000/- as full quit and she

has also stated no objection for the offence being compounded. The said

memo signed by both the parties and their respective counsel is recorded.

11. The learned Counsel for the petitioner/accused submitted that

though, as per the judgment in Damodar S.Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H.

reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, the petitioner has to pay 15% of the cheque

amount towards costs, taking into consideration, the pandemic situation the

payment of cost may be waived.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

12. In view of the above, the order passed by the appellate Court in

Crl.A.No.20 of 2019 on the file of the III Additional District & Sessions

Judge, Poonamallee dated 21.01.2020 stands set aside and the

petitioner/accused is acquitted from the offences.

13. It is to be noted, though only criminal appeal has to be preferred

as against the order of conviction, the accused herein has preferred criminal

revision, however, since the matter has been compromised between the

parties, no further order is required.

14. In view allowing the Criminal Revision, the warrant issued by the

trial Court on 23.10.2021 against the petitioner/accused stands set aside.

Consequently, the connected Crl.MP.No.12750 of 2021 is ordered and the

Crl.MP.No.11805 of 2021 is closed.

02.12.2021 Index: Yes/No.

Internet: Yes/No.

tsh/ham

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Fast Track Court, Poonamallee.

2. The III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, Poonamallee.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRl.RC.No.339 of 2020

A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

tsh

Crl.RC.No.339 of 2020

02.12.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter